Even it's a bit annoying, I do understand them trying to limit what the free, public facing model will answer but I'd say it'd be a pretty fair expectation to get more leeway for the Pro version.
It's possible to view almost every fact or opinion as somehow controversial, and I think they're misguided in trying to prevent things that may generate minor controversies.
In fact, it's interesting to see how a LLM might be biased after taking in massive amounts of training data.
If I was at OpenAI I’d be looking at this sort of ideology as what’s gonna be our downfall like it was with Dall-E 2 once a democratized model is released by someone else.
The problem is it’s so stupid it doesn’t always know how to reverse things and sometimes just makes up a result.