I don’t see an issue with employees protesting or trying to sabotage a system they see as unjust.
I don’t see an issue with employees protesting or trying to sabotage a system they see as unjust.
May as well ask family to stop having opinions on my cooking.
A family is more flat. Save for parents, a companies generally are more rigorously hierarchical.
i think a healthy working relationship involves employer & employee collaborating according to a set of mutually beneficial rules, which prevents either party from taking advantage of the other.
this is (at least idealistically) what employment contracts are for, even if they have a natural tendency to favor the employer in most situations.
besides that, i think there are plenty of examples from recent history which demonstrate that it's not healthy for the rules under which an employee operates to be solely outlined by the owner of the business (e.g. because that owner may attempt to take advantage of the employee).
If the company cannot convince you that its policies are efficient and moral, then that is their mistake for hiring somebody who sees the world fundamentally differently. If they don't want people to do that, they should tell every new manager in the hiring interview "Part of working here as a manager involves stack ranking people as low, even if they are doing great work, and not telling them they are under stack ranking, and if you cannot do that you won't want to work here"
Employees in tech have a lot of power. It’s much better than the alternative.
With that in mind, can I then assume that you're being paid by Blizzard to post here?
You should see something wrong with someone actively sabotaging a system. It's fine and maybe encouraged to protest or move on to a better opportunity, but sabotage just means they're making the whole world a little bit worse off.
sabotage just means they're making the whole world a little bit worse