Hacker News Reader

Comment by WastingMyTime89 | Hacker News Reader

It is a for profit company in everything but name. That's my main complain. It has Musk, Thiel and Livingston amongst its initial investors, all known as the greatest philantropists of our time. /s

I don't understand why they put this thin veneer on top of what they are doing. Maybe Thiel was burnt with the bad press surrounding Palantir and this is preventive damage control.

View on HN

It's literally a nonprofit

That means absolutely nothing to billionaire control freaks.

If OpenAI's products become the next Googlie thing (and here I was worried about Cloudflare <smack head>) then these are the future influencers. This is society mainlined on TikTok levels of manipulation.

Surely you have adapted to ChatGPT's requirements for interacting, have you not? There is a name for this: social engineering.

The "chat" part of ChatGPT is the least of long-term concerns. This whole AI stuff is going to be the capital (as in means of production) that's going to take increasingly big role in the future in general, to the point where it may dominate everything else in terms of sheer value. And here we are, concentrating it from the get-go in megacorps that already dominate the market.

No, it is profit-capped. And even then only on the same sense that the US government is debt-limited.

It is not literally a non-profit. As far as legally recognized organizations it is a limited partnership with a now minority ownership held by a non-profit.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com