If one or both people are mainly trying to make friends, the driving force is transient & non-intrinsic - at odds with that which endures.
Whereas with relationships that "just happen", there is a cascade of circumstance and shared interest, and those rise greater than any desire to connect. The connection is intrinsic and unstoppable as opposed to cultivated.
Pursue your own interests and the truth of your circumstance as fully as possible, as often as possible, and - crucially - for its own sake. Not to meet others, but to meet more of yourself.
Your friends will appear.
But for adults, I would say that this is not the best method. It can work, to be sure. But as adults, when various demands pull at your time (be it your job, your family, etc.) you can easily get in a state where...
> Pursue your own interests and the truth of your circumstance as fully as possible, as often as possible, and - crucially - for its own sake. Not to meet others, but to meet more of yourself.
...just leaves you still without friends because everyone else is also focusing on themselves and their own interests. This is especially rough in 2023 when people spend so much time online, alone, and so much of their hobbies revolve around being online, alone.
I have a lot of friends, and I think I'm pretty good at making and keeping friends. Friendship in adulthood looks different than childhood friendship. One of the ways it does is that it requires a certain amount of concerted effort by both parties to maintain the friendship, at once because you share interests, but also because the reciprocal effort is part of the friendship, it's constitutive of the very loyalty that typifies great friendships. It's about how despite all those competing demands on someone's time, you still decide to spend time together as friends.
It will feel unnatural and like "work" only because the preexisting social context of school or a job does a lot of work in the background. But once you realize that making and maintaining friendships takes a certain kind of effort, you can find it very rewarding. You also have the benefit of making lots of people different from yourself your friend, which people could probably use more of nowadays. I'm far more left leaning than some of my friends, but one thing that I think saves me from going completely off the deep end like some people I know is the exposure to alternative POVs that I get from my more right leaning friends.
Perhaps its similar to this place - I wouldn't necessarily consider folks here "friends", but I yet may just as deeply value some of these interactions specifically for the different ideas and opinions they expose me to.
Thanks for this one :)
This is especially true because (I forget where I read this), statistically, most of your friends will be less socially assertive than you.
I know personally, if I stopped putting in effort to friendships -- positive friendships which bring net value into my life! -- all but maybe one or two would wither away, simply for want of ever seeing or interacting with each other.
Finding potential friends, I agree with your advice. Following your own interests makes you an interesting and attractive person, and finding people who share your interests sets you up for healthy friendships.
No effort is required to begin a friendship that happens automatically. Both naturally organise a next meet, and/or already have reason to and/or happily can't avoid it. Relationships often begin at work/edu for this reason.
The times I've been assertive and essentially built a connection out of what was nothing, it's been interesting, even exhilarating - but less reliably enduring. It's tended to be better to begin with a bigger "spark".
And if that spark isn't enough to create a shared excitement that automatically leads to a next step, without requiring effort, it may mean it's not worth such effort.
(Not always, though.)
I don't really have many friends. For someone to be my "friend" they'd have to be a person I'd spend time with when I'm bored, and who I could reasonably count on to have my back when I need it.
At the moment, I don't really have any people I can consider "friends" by that definition - I either don't like spending time with people (nothing to do, no place to be, too stressful, etc. etc.) or I'm simply "just another friend" to people. There is a certain type of individuals that like to be friendly with everyone. They radiate an "aura" of deep connection with you and make you feel special... When in fact they're that way with everyone, and you're just another victim of their well-trained manipulation techniques.
I don't really know how to get those "real" friendships. I remember I had some as a kid. I don't even know how I got those - was it just geographical proximity? Being forced to be in the same room for 8 hours a day?
I wish I knew. But solitude is pleasant, too, even though it's not as profitable.
It's important to point out that the starting point is a very shallow relationship that actually has no depth to it. Over time, these shallow relationships may gain depth. Much like a river carving through stone. If you have no patience you are not likely to get to the point if getting deep relationships, and if you do, you'll probably be overwhelming the other person with eagerness and/or desperation and/or being out of touch with social norms. Likewise, the best way to find love is to date lots and get dumped lots that it's no longer a major event and you just move on.
Because much like you, I haven't really kept good friends along in life. I've had periods in my life when I had a "good" friend, that I could talk a lot of stuff with, share my problems, and generally do activities in common, but I moved around, I haven't really kept in touch.
Problem is, without a social circle, it's much more difficult to find a partner, and I'm at an age now where that's the main thing I think I'm missing.
But I understand the issue very well from a theoretical standpoint. At its core, it's about a disordered attachment style, a sort of fear of attachment, or a failure of the brain to regulate the affect resulting from interactions. A result of early developmental trauma. I'm also familiar with some techniques that are supposed to fix the problem (I was building a neurofeedback system based on ADS1299 at one point), but life got in the way. Which is ironic, since I think this is the most important aspect of any life, social functioning.
No, not at the moment.
I've been through several long-term relationships, and I think I'm too emotionally fucked up to actually be in one for real. There's a whole array of issues, and I don't even know how to sum them up. In a nutshell, I don't really like being myself.
It's well worth it to learn how to accept and like yourself. After all, the one person you can count on having the rest of your life, is you! Good luck!
A friend friend of mine with very similar thoughts as me (and, it sounds like, you) recently put it very well. The "workplace proximity associate" kind of friends, while kind of destined to remain shallow and not as deep a connection as any of us might want, are not unimportant. They ground us in a way and help us keep a connection to the world, but maybe not so much individuals.
Networking is complete bullshit because people who are highly social recognize potential areas for self-interest in relationship-building and any behavior that follows that path gets flagged subconsciously as disingenuous. Make friends and treat other people as you would like to be treated.
There is also a need to communicate, in order to give the other person a sense of your investment in the relationship (as represented by your time, effort, and candor) and material with which to formulate substantive responses and reciprocate with their own time, effort, and candor.
You have no control over how other people connect with you, and frankly, their opinion and feelings toward you are none of your business. Don't overtrain your behavior upon your perception of the progress of bonding. Just do what is right, fun, kind, and ethical. The rest falls into place.
I haven't read the Ferrazzi book but my understanding is that he shuns networking to instead reframe the concept as "connecting," and this is more in line with my own viewpoint.
I'd appreciate a better explanation of his viewpoint from someone who has read the book.
My experience has been "having something to offer" is far and away the biggest factor, or rather what they think you have to offer. Everyone has plenty to offer, but not everyone immediately sees it, let alone appreciates it. The majority of people you meet won't be a "genuine bond" right away.
What works the best for me is simple. You focus on them without betraying yourself. It's sort of a dance. You treat discussions like a ball that cannot be dropped and listen well. You aren't afraid to take the lead and always have something new when things get boring. You avoid going deep into a topic until you've tried at least a few others or get a strong reaction. You keep how often you talk about yourself in check and keep it relevant. It's really a broader mindset in life of constantly searching for common ground. You are not trying to please them, but just asserting what you both want in a natural way. You're keeping them involved and not being awkward sharing control of the interaction.
> "it happens sometimes, but infrequently, and doesn't seem to be under my control at all."
So it's that last part that was my problem. I used to be pretty awkward sharing control in social interactions. I would ramble without ever looking up at their face or willfully ignore body language stubbornly thinking it was what I was saying rather than everything else. I would zone out because I didn't know how to say I didn't know what they were talking about. I was too inside my own head. My thoughts about them would pile up and go unresolved. I was more comfortable making assumptions and trying to guess rather than just asking them. In short, I was afraid.
No clue if this helps you or anyone. I tried. That's all we can do.
That's not to say there are no people I am on friendly terms with (coworkers, exes, ex-coworkers, people I knew 20+ years ago in college, etc).
From a utilitarian standpoint, it's important to have a few people you can reach out to to find work. And from a social standpoint, the times of my life where I had no social connections were difficult. But people have different needs, and my social needs are very modest. Do not feel bad because you don't have friends just because you think you're expected to.
As far as the title of the book, I believe eating alone is one of the great joys in life, especially when it's a respite from the forced social atmosphere of an open-plan office.
No, I do not have anyone I'm on friendly terms with due to a shared interest. I do sometimes go to meetups to talk about things, but I do not care about those people, and I do not expect them to care about me.
I do have some legacy friendships as I said before. These typically run multiple years between interactions, and that's how I like it. I recently met up with a college-era friend because I was in town. My kid enjoyed playing with her kids. Before that, we hadn't had significant contact in a few years.
I might make more friends when kids grow up and time frees up though.
But I joined a language school class and made friends there. I joined a basketball team and made friends there too.
It seems weird but I’m starting to think that it’s as simple as if you interact someone once a week for a decent period of time and their personality is kinda compatible with yours then you become friends.
So if I was looking to make friends now, I’d look for a group activity with a weekly commitment that involves people who are likely to share some common interests.
I think shared experiences are key to creating a common bond. If you talk with old school friends, most people will end up talking about past events, this is a re-enforcing mechanism.
I think also that there is an intensity to the shared experience that matters as well. Sitting across the desk from someone for 10 years might build a bond, but it might also not last long outside of that workplace. Whereas people doing something physical and emotional together creates a stronger bond.
Personally, as someone with older kids, I'm now trying new physical activities and meeting new people. I can see I am making new friends, I've created conversations and interactions which go beyond just the original weekly activity.
The time spent together is significant and often underrated in my observations. No: I don't believe you can maintain, even less build, a friendship with only a few hours of occasional monthly talks over coffee. This is no surprise why BJJ courses are renowned for being so efficient at creating and solidifying friendships; you have similar people meeting regularly and struggling toward improving a specific skill.
The amount of time spent and the quality of that time will vastly influence the likelihood of friendships forming.
For me, I normally share something mildly personal and see how they respond. Most of my closest friends and I clicked as soon as we met each-other, and talked about our hopes, dreams, fears, ambitions, traumas, worries, or some other personal topic right off the bat. If people are weirded out or uncomfortable by me being vulnerable, that means they're probably not in the same position, or we probably aren't very compatible.
Go out there, don't judge, and be yourself.
Genuine friendship comes with shared interests (which is why it's easier to find friends in common activities that you are genuinely interested in), but also the simple chance of meeting interesting people. The best predictor of friendships in student dorms seems to be the relative distance of their rooms - see Kurzgesagt's "Why You Are Lonely and How to Make Friends" at https://youtu.be/I9hJ_Rux9y0 for some more interesting facts.
It's completely normal to have different level of friends - some to party with, some to nerd around certain topics with, some to have deep meaningful talks but you only can stand a meeting once a quarter... And you are only able to actively maintain a certain number of friendships.
I found that I don't have nearly as many "friends" as many of my peers have (being a 40-something doesn't help much either), but the friends I got are rock solid. They are kinda lopsided because I'm offering too much help most of the time without accepting much help from them - that's what I need to work on.
Maybe you should do the things I haven't tried doing: get a dog, have children, and join BJJ, Crossfit, and a church.
Just visit places of your genuine interests. And suit it to your age or don't bother at all.
- Join interesting online forums with offline presence. Be a regular in those places. It can be a book club, a chess club, a science club, coding club or anything. Be true to your interests and start visiting. Or join a fully offline one in your locality. Actively interact with new people.
- Join a class. A gym class, karate, dance, art, pottery, recreational math- doesn't matter. Join a class and be a regular. Actively interact with new people.
- Join a one-time activity group. Like building a school, Christmas drama group. You get to spend time with new people over weeks regularly.
- If you are religious or can tolerate religion, join a church, or your-religion-equivalent of it. I have seen lifelong friendships develop out of them.
- If you are politically active, or want to do so, work actively for a political party for an election. Actively interact with new people.
- Join an NGO or a charity or actively volunteer your time for a cause that you believe in. Actively interact with new people.
- Catch up with college/school friends with whom you were never that close. People change, and you might find the new-old-acquinstance quite interesting.
You see, friendships need to evolve naturally. You cannot choose or take scrupulously calculated steps.
Just spend time in an interested area, you already have one interest overlap. When you find 2/3, that person starts to look interesting.
Please let nature take its own course. You just increase your probability by mixing out with a lot more newer people.
This is my advice to "how to find a romantic partner" as well.
All it takes is to start talking.
Also not all friendships have to be the same.
Some are in person, some are online, some are not as frequent, some are inactive, and some might be gone.
I still keep in touch with and meet up with people I’ve not worked with in years.
Friendship is the result to be good people, to take care of others, to be trustworthy, to be a good listener, etc. Friendship will come after that.
Maybe 1 out 100 people you meet will be a friend, and 1 out 10 will last. Anyway, they will be with you because how you are, not just with them, but with others, even when you thinks you don't have anything to offer.
Networking is just other thing, totally different.
.. oh, you mean now. Uh. hmm…
But answering your question… I was at a point of my life with 40+ years old that I thought I would never (or wanted to) make new friends. Totally ok with that. But then I decided to write a novel and enrolled in a fiction writing course.
The course had a few characteristics. It was long. Every Thursday from March to November we would meet online. The teacher had an approach of quickly summarizing a topic and leave the rest of the class for discussion. So, it was not just a bunch of people listening a lecture with the camera and mic off. We were talking with each other all the time. Also, it was a topic that everyone was very invested in and generated initiatives to continue to talk about it outside of regular Thursday classes, like a Telegram group first and then an extra-official meeting almost every Tuesday.
When you spend almost a year, talking to the same 20 people once or twice a week, about a topic you care, you create some opportunity for new friendships. So I do now, two years later, consider that I have made a few new friends.
The unlucky part is that those people are from all over the country, just one or two in my city. And, of course, for now, they are not like old friendships that I have. But, who knows, in twenty years or so they might still be around and be really close friends.
So that’s how I started new friendships
http://zeroprecedent.com/A%E2%9D%AF%E2%9D%AEON%20deck%20v.3....
2. Have shared interests. This one it's not going to be under your control, because you won't be able to force yourself to like something that you don't, consistently.
3. Throw "guides" and books about making friends and connections in the trash.
There was a similar thread to this a couple years back, and I had a number of people contact me. I honestly tried and I just didn’t connect with any of them.
I think it comes down to the specificity of our interests and having trouble even finding a shared vocabulary.
I think that is part of why so many of us rally around fandoms so fervently, it’s a strong shared interest and culture. For better or worse I have just never cared about a fiction enough to have much to say.
Correct. You don't control someone else, and it takes two to become friends.
I don't think there is a secret trick. You can try to increase the chance to meet someone. Take up a new sport, charity work, etc.
Is it really genuine if youre preparing a strategy?
Or less flippantly....
It's like making a budget before you spend. The money is still real, you simply evaluated where to use it and set ground rules for yourself.
If youre building network to get advantage, then it doesnt feel genuine
If you build network cuz you just like those ppl and the advantage is accidental side effect then it feels genuine
Oh look there is even a post title that seems to be what you are looking for: https://www.raptitude.com/2021/01/how-to-make-friends-as-an-...
Once you have kids, it often happens that you only have time to see the parents of their friends. Sometimes you don't have a choice, but sometimes you find like minded parents that turn into friends.
For those that you know would enjoy it, get a rhythm of regular correspondence, and that should turn into quality friendships.
This rhythm IMO is the missing part
These things tend to occur less naturally later in life for most people, so you have to go out and find them. I'm just approaching the age where my kids will be entering a school system and sports of their own soon, so I expect some relationships will form with other parents through that shared experience. I'm fortunate to have maintained great relationships from high school and college though...not everyone is as open to adding new people to their circle at this stage of life.
tldr: find other people to share passions / challenges with. Don't worry about moving on if it doesn't click.
For me its been all about hobbies.
A few years ago i started asking myself "What would young Colin want?" IE, what was I interested in as a child, that as an adult I could learn from.
I realized there were big aspects of who I was, or how I grew up which were simply missing from my current life. So I started to add them back in in the simplest ways I knew how.
For me that meant that over the past 5 years I've added, short backpacking and canoe trips (rental canoes), learning to snowboard, playing golf, Ice Climbing, Photography, going deeper on my electronic music production.
The biggest wins have been snowboarding, camping, and by far golf.
With snowboarding, I was able to get some existing friends and then coworkers to start going on quick 3 hour drive day trips. A few existing friend got back into the sport, a coworker started and bought gear, I met 3 more coworkers outside of my team by organizing work trips. I just went with two guys this weekend who were old workers from a few years ago, its our 4th season doing these trips and Ive probabbly expanded my circle from 1 friend to about 10 who have participated.
With camping, it was similar. I had one friend who started with me, then he invited some of his friends and they invited theirs. The group keeps finding more people and coming up with new ideas. Weve probably got a circle of 8 people who have gone and weve done about 3 years or regular trips. there are more people who WANT to go though, its just a matter of time.
BUT GOLF IS THE REAL WINNER. Everyone seems to know these days of the "third place" problem, or the "Bowling alone" problem. Golf really has avoided these issues and really after 2020 lockdown expanded a ton. With golf, first of all... you can go alone, and you will meet usually 3 strangers every time. And in the last 3 years of doing that, I have met amazing people 99% of the time. really it would be very difficult for me to name a time i met someone i didnt like on some level... and some of the people ive met have been amazing. BUT, the old adage that "business happens on the golf course" is still true today, even in tech. We have a golf chat at work, and I regularly play with our CTO and other bigwigs at the company that I would never have met otherwise. In fact the very first person I met at the company (its a remote job) was the CTO... because we just both wanted to play golf. I am personally NOT a networking guy, when i play golf.. i dont talk about work. some do and that fine, but I let others decide. Besides work, I have about 10 people that I have kinda integrated into little outings. some are just terrible golfers and we go to terrible cheap courses and enjoy the sunshine, losing balls and then finding them in the woods. I have a best friend at work because of golf, and my work connections spread far over the company into areas i absolutely would never have ventured otherwise. Ive played with people from finance, law, tech, commercial real estate, medicine, advertising, film production, people from other parts of the world... so many that I have played with over the last few yearsthat it is simply uhh, mind boggling. I could go on and on about golf, but im gonna shut up about it.
Start doing things you love, pursue things you think are out of reach, bring a couple people you might know along, ask them to bring their friends, ask to play again when you meet someone cool. Its often awkward!!! and often fails... but you have the ability to open up your own world, and the world of those near to you.