Yes but using AI to generate works that can be used commercially is the way commercial AI companies plan to monetize AI.
How much of that is going back to the copyright holders whose work their service derives value from ?
how much of the earnings of the student of art goes to the textbook authors, paintings and learning materials he used to get to where he is today?
But the AI as a whole is capable of reproducing the original in a recognizable form, and it does so on demand quite easily, because it was trained on them - how is it different than selling a zip file containing millions of copyrighted works, and also a bunch of new stuff?
so you're saying that the digits of pi is violating copyright then?