"Lamar’s amendments also clarify that sites ending in .com, .org and .net are not covered by the bill. Only foreign sites fall under SOPA’s wrath."
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/12/sopa-watered-down-a...
"Lamar’s amendments also clarify that sites ending in .com, .org and .net are not covered by the bill. Only foreign sites fall under SOPA’s wrath."
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/12/sopa-watered-down-a...
Well in the US we have this thing called "constitutional rights" which say, among other things, that Congress shall make no law "abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press".
Laws blocking results returned from a DNS server is just about the closest thing imaginable to "abridging a press" in the 21 century.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root_zone_file#Root_server_sup...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Corporation_for_Assig...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Assigned_Numbers_Auth...