Hacker News Reader

Comment by ZeroCool2u | Hacker News Reader

Seems like Apple executed the way Google should have with their Google Home Max. They've added stereo pairing, so you can have two of them sync up together and then connect them to an Apple TV 4k and you basically get a pretty nice wireless sound bar with Dolby Atmos enabled.

Still, at $300 per pod, I really need Siri to do better than the "dumber than a bag of rocks" vibe she currently gives off for this to be at all tempting.

As someone that does applied DL for work, especially NLP, I just don't understand what Apple is doing with Siri. It's like they see low user engagement metrics with Siri and assume it's because people don't want it. Instead, everyone I know that's an Apple fan uses Google Assistant, because it just works most of the time.

View on HN

Sorry if I'm misunderstanding, but Google smart speakers have had stereo pairing for a while. https://support.google.com/googlenest/answer/7559493?hl=en-C...

So have HomePods. What is them automatically noticing another HomePod and offering to setup a stereo pair.

Bought Google Max for the parents, & holy cow the pairing is terrible. Unusable entirely with a TV, huge lag.

I have the "headphones out" line coming from the tv, which I split, and then send to the line-in on each speaker. At least there is a line-in! Less and less smart speakers have a line in, it feels like. Absurd. (Different story, but also, really wish the Chromecast Audio were still a thing. Some inventory left but what a great product for adding amazing connective capability to any sound system! Smart being counter-analog-line-level stuff is such a shite hellworld thing.)

I would go so far as to describe Siri as "aggressively useless".

I try to squelch my alarm in the morning and she replies with "sorry you'll need to continue in the app" (silencing the alarm anyways but not actually dismissing it). If I wake up before my alarm and want to stop it from sounding, I tell her to turn it off, she says she has done so (with a follow-up question confirming that I have no alarms enabled)… And then the god damn alarm goes off at the usual time anyways.

Most recently she has started replying to my requests to send text messages and start phone calls with "who is speaking?" I don't know maybe the only person who matters on this single user device? If I don't say my name to her satisfaction then the call doesn't get made. I never did any kind of voice training or enabled any kind of restriction based on voice matching so what the fuck?

The last straw which led to me unplugging my home pod was when both it and the phone started triggering at nearly the same time with the result that the speech of one started interfering with the requests to the other one.

Bonus points: the speech recognition tech is bad enough that I tend to wait for acknowledgment before speaking a command. The "Boop" that you get from Alexa and Google. Not only does Siri not have this, it triggers, waits for a moment, and then says something. One of these responses is a annoyed sounding teenager "yeah?" that has more than once had me fantasizing about the immediate defenestration of the speaker.

> Seems like Apple executed the way Google should have with their Google Home Max

Google properly executing on Google TV would require them to not build hardware with 1/12th the single core performance of an Apple TV. (Seriously, it has single core performance around that of a 2011 Intel Atom while the Apple TV has an A15 throwing 12th gen Intel laptop numbers. https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/19594628)

Seriously, what is with The Chromecast with Google TV? People are like "It's laggy!" and Google is like "We do update!" and people are like "Now it's laggy AND crashes!" My entire experience with my three of them. Software is great, hardware is pure eWaste and they should feel bad about that.

I’ve seen the GTV on sale for $20, the ATV is almost $200. That’s a 10x in price difference.

I think the most sensible way to use both devices is as a dumb “cast” target.

FWIW, the fireTV literally had a bug where it’d crash because the ad data collecting daemon used up too much processing power. For $20, just be thankful Google has that much self control.

Fair point but, this is the definition of fuzzing the margins here. The Google TV retail price is $50, the Apple TV is $129 now.

I get that that is a big jump but it's not 12 times the price. The performance per dollar tends to go down as you go up in price, not up.

To be fair, google extend this to software on the Apple TV too - the YouTube and YouTube TV apps are both complete trash that don’t respond to scrolling properly because they’ve been built using some cross platform garbage instead of for the target platform. HBO Max is another offender.

Worth noting that Google has gone to extra effort here to make YouTube bad on AppleTV; their original first-party AppleTV app was actually significantly better.

The stereo pairing was available on the 1st generation.

I have three of the 1st gen models, they're fantastic. I think I paid $200 for each. At that price they're a steal.

Yeah, I'm a little confused as to what's actually new here from the video?

I assume a newer chipset but it's not really clear what else has changed?

They're for sale again for starters. The first generation was discontinued a couple years ago. I think they had some manufacturing issue which meant they kept dying prematurely. It's possible this is basically a small spec bump + they should actually work this time

The display on top is much larger.

The new HomePod has 4 microphones and 5 tweeters.

The original HomePod had 6 microphones and 7 tweeters.

New one weighs 5.1 pounds vs. 5.5 pounds previously.

Via https://twitter.com/rsgnl/status/1615719411813593097

New one has a thread antenna for Matter mesh.

The size.

Apple discontinued the OG size HomePod a while back, and sold only the tiny baseball-sized ones. This is a re-introduction of a larger-size, better-sounding device that I assume is essentially the same form factor as the original one.

Careful on 'sounding' as this appears to have cut back speaker array.

I wouldn't discount the difference chipset can make, especially with respect to features it can support - the original homepod had an anaemic processor in comparison to just about any other apple kit.

> Instead, everyone I know that's an Apple fan uses Google Assistant, because it just works most of the time.

Really? I know lots of Apple fans and I've never seen any of them use Google Assistant on their iPhone or anything else. How do your friends do this? Via a Siri shortcut that passes requests through? Or by opening up a Google app every time they want to use the voice assistant?

I use Siri for mundane things. Horses for courses.

For music though, I prefer browsing through a playlist or artist discogs. Recalling a track from memory and requesting an assistant to play it isn’t very intuitive.

Siri aside, I’m very much looking forward to this update.

You can ask voice assistants to play playlists or albums as well, not just a single track.

I mean, I like scrolling through track names, albums and cover art.

I rarely walk into a records store knowing exactly what I want, and live the process of discovery.

I’m very much an anecdote here, but want to give a different perspective. I’m an Apple “fan” (at least, I have more of Apple’s devices than other brands), and I don’t want voice activation. I don’t feel comfortable something listening to all my intimate family conversations. Maybe Apple fans are more likely to be privacy conscious.

All that being said, it doesn’t need to be either or. They could have a great Siri product for those who want it, and allow it to be deactivated for those who don’t.

You want a Sonos SL or Ikea Symfonisk (Sonos sw/hw in Ikea design). Great products, no mic, Airplay 2 support, massive group pairing and the same room detection tuning Apple bragged about in the Homepod via the App on a phone instead of mics. (Sonos holds the patent on it and famously made no claims about Apple stealing it while asking Google and Amazon to pay licenses, aka: Apple Ponied up.)

> Sonos holds the patent on it

I’m a huge Sonos fan but I think their patent was “volume control for connected/synced speakers” and apple had a UI to control each speaker volume separately.

I also suspect that apple shared Airplay with them j stead of paying. I know lots of people that bought Sonos instead of the HomePod because it supported airplay.

Edit: nevermind

https://www.engadget.com/sonos-google-itc-compliant-initial-...

Nope. Google turned the trueplay knockoff off real fast (as it was easy to remove) and took time to disable group volume control.

Room detection isn't exclusive to Sonos, unless you're claiming YPAO/Dirac/Audyssey also licensed it. The HomePod is different because it does detection at the source, where everything else needs you to sample with a mic or phone app.

That room detection onboard belongs to Sonos. Auto Trueplay is what they call it.

> They've added...

HomePods OG do stereo pairing, and with ATV can act as eARC playback so you can play your console sound via HomePods stereo pair.

For a couple years now, though weirdly the full firmware revamp landed after discontinuation.

Stereo pairing was a feature of the original first generation HomePods . Siri has always been a limitation of buying this product due to the best bang per buck for the audio quality.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com