Wikipedia editors serving long sentences in Saudi Arabia since 2020
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
Wikipedia admin jailed for 32 years after alleged Saudi infiltration - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34278322 - Jan 2023 (65 comments)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/09/14/saudi-ara...
This piece by the Washington Post Editorial Board published in September 2022 actually mentioned one of the two Wikipedians but described him merely as "a writer, translator and computer programmer" – so the Wikipedia connection wasn't clear.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/aug/16/saudi-woman-gi...
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/saudi-arabia-american-jailed-t...
To list a few....
And Elon Musk is using Saudi money to fund his Twitter:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattdurot/2022/10/31/saudi-prin...
It is unlikely that Elon will mention anything of this to the Saudi's of course. They are too rich even for him to criticize.
Saudi Arabia even got away with killing Jamal Khashoggi on foreign terrirotiry:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_Jamal_Khashog...
And then the US government protected Saudi Arabia from any lawsuits in the US:
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/12/7/immunity-cited-as-k...
I've just randomly clicked this link and... How in the world did you even manage to phrase it like that?
Why do people lie in their summaries that often these days? Do you seriously expect that people are actually that ignorant that they won't call you out?
Just 5 seconds into the article and knowing what a "diplomatic immunity" is all you need to see that the summary has nothing to do with an actual subject of the article.
Is anyone else disturbed by how easily people twist and erase information in their sum-ups? What's up with that?