Customer returned $800 in books after using them to stage a home for holidays
insider.com
insider.com
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-04-15/supermarket-shopper-t...
[1] https://www.accc.gov.au/update/accc-grants-authorisation-for...
[2] https://www.accc.gov.au/public-registers/authorisations-and-...
People doing this should realize there is a very palpable network effect on everyone else not indulging. For the sake of own influencer livelihood, and just because it is within legality - they should not be throwing someone's life into a whirlpool for few more likes/views/clicks.
I feel sorry for the bookseller (and glad they've recouped) but imagine the alternative when this charitable act didn't happen. In addition to stocking, bookseller often take care of shipping return costs too. More so for rare/expensive books. It would have been catastrophic to the business.
True, although it should be noted that the world of "influencers" is starting to shape into an industry of its own, moving beyond individual egos.
There are, for example, companies such as The Social Chain[1] whose (almost) sole role in life is influencer management, content production, "social-first distribution" and podcasting.
I agree that neither "influencers" or the "industry" surrounding them are something that need to exist. I doubt anyone would miss them if they were not there.
Given the owner says of the books
> They were expensive (some wrapped) art and cook books
there is a possibility this $800 sale was for fewer than a dozen items. Maybe even fewer than 5 items.
A small number of items doesn’t excuse the unethical behavior of a buyer using a small business’s inventory as stage props, though it does put said behavior in perspective, so to speak.
In any case, it’s good empathetic readers purchased enough new books to offset the revenue shortfall.
An "exchange only" policy should be in place. And only for unopened items.
Your idea needs to have a meeting with Mr Reality.
a) The business world is competitive, you are competing with the likes of Amazon who have a no-nonsense returns policy. If you become known as a business with a troublesome returns process, then customers will simply vote with their feet.
b) People returning stuff after short-use is, like it or not, a fact of life in today's world. Ask anyone who sells fashion goods ... girls buy stuff for the Friday night party and return it on Monday. It happens and it's basically a cost of doing business. If the stock is any good, it will get sold anyway, just as nearly-new instead of new.
c) In an increasing number of jurisdictions, the law falls on the side of the buyer. For example in the EU, your "exchange only" policy would be an absolute non-starter (with very few exceptions, e.g. food items, healthcare items etc).
With the exception of online purchases, that's only true for the return of non-faulty items. In Ireland, for example, you have no right to change your mind after the purchase and return the item just because you didn't like it (except for online purchases, which must allow 14 days for return).
Now, many shops will still allow you to return items within a certain time frame for your money back, but they would be well within their rights to operate an exchange-only or store-credit policy (and some do!).
However, if the item is faulty or not fit for purpose then the seller must offer you a replacement, repair, refund, or reduction in price. Whether or not you are entitled to choose which of these you get is dependent on how long since you bought the item, and whether or not the suggested repairs/replacement are reasonable.
Not really. Most of it ends up in a dumpster unless these are really high-end items. Or in some liquidation warehouse if the quality is good enough. Otherwise, probably on a landfill in Ghana.
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/01/30/business/online-shopping-...
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-08-12/fast-fashion-turning-...
Return fraud leading to perfectly good clothes being wasted is not only bad for the environment but likely leads to higher clothes prices for legitimate customers.
You get blacklisted very quickly if you do this.
Perhaps if a business lost sales to "girls buy[ing] stuff for the Friday night party" they might gain them from people like me who see the prices as higher than I'd want to pay in the first place.
Maybe maybe not, but then you end up returning to point a) ... along comes Amazon with Prime Try Before You Buy
Amazon is not doing this out of charity.They know suckers love friction less experience only to buy stuff they don't need and then forget to return it.
Where is this? I have never seen this as an option.
b) Hence a policy to ward off this kind of clients. Why bother selling if you will have the item back - with the costs of restocking, processing, dumping or relisting, cleaning, etc?
c) I don't think so. Here in NZ and Australia very few places offer a return policy for change of mind - and most places are online outlets. IF you buy something on the street be prepared to have the option to exchange only.
I have personally found some gems at Good Will though.
Aw… I never get to meet anyone who appreciates John Wyndham. Anyone who looks at my bookcase and gives me the thumbs up for my old sci-fi paperbacks rather than last month's hardcover hit-cookbook is more than welcome.
You should see how the film industry used to return rental cars.
Not something I'm very proud of.
What surprises me in this case is that the realtor actually cared about the content of books. The vast majority know that people won't actually look at the titles and just care about the ambiance created.