Among opponents: Bachmann.
Among opponents: Bachmann.
Knowing what the hell you're doing is, sadly, not required.
This sentiment is exactly why they can keep doing it.
It reflects an implicit (and unfortunately, widely held) assumption that they're trying to get elected to help their fellow men, constituents and otherwise do good.
Sadly, there is no supporting evidence for this assumption, and endless supporting evidence against it.
Understanding the problems is an important first step towards solving them, but understanding alone is, obviously, not enough to fix the problems here.
> understanding alone is, obviously, not enough to fix the problems here.
Which problem? Are you implying that elected politicians are trying to fix things for the average citizen? if so, why do you think that?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_actor%E2%80%93politici...
Here is Bachmann's top sources of donations:
http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/summary.php?cid=N0002...
Notice no Movie/Music Industry in the top 5
Then here is Franken's:
http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/summary.php?cid=N0002...
Time Warner is his number one supporter. I would imagine that they are for it.
http://theoriesofconspiracy.com/2011/11/list-of-major-compan...
OpenSecrets:"The organizations themselves did not donate, rather the money came from the organizations' PACs, their individual members or employees or owners, and those individuals' immediate families."
The first clause is in red and bold.
(Edit:I apologize to the reader(s) who felt that directly quoting the links cited by the parent comment was objectionable.)
Chicken or egg?