This guy has been shown to be borderline fraudulent and motivated by money
He pushes some theoretical "cell repair" supplements like NMN and resveratrol, but he is repetitively clear they're experimental, and that his evidence is anecdotal.
I understand he is invested in them, but I don't jump to "fraud" because of that.
His team had other groundbreaking results, such as partially restoring damaged optical nerves in mice by injecting a virus in the eye[1].
1. https://www.science.org/content/article/researchers-restore-...
Used to be that the burden was laid on scientists not to be merchants...
It puts a bad taste in my mouth given the fact that Sinclair tries to brand himself as someone who puts the interests of humanity over his own.
In the video below Dr. Brad Stanfield discusses the controversy:
I’ve seen multiple people over the last 15 years say that we’re 3-5 years out from a breakthrough that will result in 120-200 year lifespans. Yet those breakthroughs have yet to materialize.
Of course that alone doesn’t mean they are trying to scam people or are perpetrating a fraud, but there seems to be a lot of hype with little to show.