Tesla cuts prices by up to a fifth in US and Europe as EV price war starts
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
Something I think a lot of people, particularly in car enthusiast circles, or highly paid Hacker News reader circles, is just how little people want to pay for cars. A £45k car is an expensive car for most people.
Bearing in mind that there are plenty of good cars at £25k (new) and plenty of supply of second hand cars that are only a few years old and much cheaper.
As a comparison, I'm happy to spend £2k on a laptop, but the vast majority of people are buying in the £500-1k range (or replacing with a cheap tablet etc). A £2k laptop is probably in the top ~10% of the laptop market, as much as it might seem totally normal to me.
Tesla really need to expand to more of the market, with, say, a $35,000 car. I'd love to see a small hatchback for £20k from them, and I think it would do very well in Europe. Much better than an £80k ~tank~ truck.
For example, Teslas are more expensive to maintain than the ICE industry average - $832 versus $650 for other cars. https://jalopnik.com/advisor/tesla-maintenance-cost/#:~:text....
In terms of fuel, well that very much depends on what happens to electricity prices when a lot of people start plugging in their EVs. Again, people assume they will just remain the same in response to an increase in demand, but color me skeptical. The only way electricity prices can avoid rapidly increasing is if it becomes illegal for you to plug in your EV.
You should in general be suspicious of anyone making claims about total cost of ownership calculations, and heavily discount such claims -- whether it is your local IBM/Oracle salesman or your local car salesman. It is usually a mechanism to justify higher up front purchase prices. Next time someone refuses to be price competitive with other options but makes an appeal to TCO, ask them to put that into writing -- that your TCO will be lower otherwise you will get a refund on the purchase price. Just watch their mouth drop.
Also ICE’s are still way ahead in energy density (energy per kilogram/pound) even if you count the big engine with it
Then again, maybe it's OK in U.S. where most of the cars are crappy on the inside - my ex had an American BMW X5 and it felt like cheap crap too, quite unlike it's European cousin. But it won't fly here in Europe.
People who talk about TCO for a car are already setting the bar crazy high to justify buying an expensive car that they don't really need.
I have paid for 2nd hand car about 3k. Can imagine to buy new one for 20k but as someone who does not use it daily, 45k seems crazy for a car.
If I want to drive over the mountains or 500miles on a road trip, I just have to remember to pack a toolbox. Generally simple fixes easily done.
Practically speaking, I just rent a car for a couple of days for those harder outings rather than put my elderly car through that.
Anyway, your laptop cost more than my car.
So yeah, my main reason for driving a pricier car is, well, less chance of death and leaving behind my family.
In most of the world (my rough guess) a Tesla costs as much or more than a house. Not an easy thing to invest in that rusts, crashes and wears out.
I agree but there was an article shared here the other day that outlined how new car prices are higher than ever. The average new car (non-luxury) price was/is around $45K
I don't know the numbers for Europe/UK, but anecdotally, that sort of price doesn't seem at all common to me, whereas I do know people who would only ever consider buying second hand cars. Plus the fact that trucks aren't a thing here probably brings down our prices significantly.
A quick look at the Office of National Statistics suggests that the average UK price is £36500 for electric/hybrid, or £29000 for petrol/diesel (still the majority of the market here). That seems quite a bit lower than the US, and is still only the new car market.
And finally, I imagine most Brits can't actually afford a £42k vehicle - even on decent finance that's £500-600 a month - that's how much I pay in mortgage for my house.
Oh well, that's part of what happens when the manufacturer is also the only seller.
Interestingly, when GM did something similar to 2022 Bolt customers, they cut them a check to make them feel better about the slashed price on the 2023 model. Tesla definitely won't do any such thing, of course. Most manufacturers probably wouldn't. It's interesting that GM chose to.
I'm also seeing some regret on the part of Ioniq 5 owners who say they'd have bought a Model Y at this price instead of the I5. It's interesting how many people bought competing EVs just because Tesla was too expensive.
I am not seeing the connection. If the manufacturer reduced the price it was selling at to the middlemen, why would the middlemen (assuming there are numerous) not also lower their price to win more customers?
People who normally drove "boring" cars like Civics and Camrys because they saw cars as a utilitarian purchase swung for a Tesla because it was more of a tech purchase than a car purchase.
So a lot of people insist it's the best car they've ever driven, and they're not lying... they just haven't driven many non-utilitarian cars.
We didn't buy a Tesla because it was a step up from a Camry, but because Teslas are so much more fun to drive. It's really that simple.
The minority of us who had fun to drive cars in the first place are not the ones going with Teslas for the fun driving experience. (if anything I know more who do in spite of the driving experience for practical reasons... I was one of them when I first got here from NYC)
I mentioned Civic and Camry because they're common in the entire US, but most BMWs/Audis/Lexuses driven in the Bay Area are similarly utilitarian models.
There might be a few more M3/M4s in our parking lot than you'd find in a random one across the country for example, but they're still drowned out by SUVs and sedans with base engines.
-
Maybe we're talking past each other because I'm assuming "fun to drive" in terms of driving dynamics, where by "fun to drive" you might mean the tech part.
That would be more in line with my original point, and I could actually see being common.
People buy Teslas because they're fun to drive, because they believe EVs help the environment, because of the charging network, because of the autopilot (which has been really excellent in my case), because of the promise of FSD (which is something that should never have been released), or because they think Musk is a great buddy. And any combination of those points. I'm sure you'll find some who think the fart app is cool, and, yes, there'll be some who think it's a luxury car.
I did rent a BMW on my last vacation in Europe, and it wasn't just the interior details looking good, it was the silence and the smoothness, like all the parts fit and were damped against vibration, that impressed me.
When i look at the shabby model 3 interior, i see soneone that forced into reality a mass produced pure electric vehicle, when the common wisdom was it was impossible, and with the great result of helping of us surviving the carbon burn en route to a truly advanced civilization. Now that the path is showm, others will follow, but kudos.
A shame he has now surrounded himself with so many yes men as to force his mind out of the great common reality, but perhaps he has done enough good in the world, it is ok for him to inhabit a world of delusions for a while.
I was stressed at having a 36 month loan as a public school teacher (I did not, of course, spring for the BMW).
I probably wouldn’t want to be paying a loan at the point I would want to be trading something in — but even then I keep things more than even 84 months and you can always just pay it off.
It's a car; a depreciating asset. I think people got way too attached to the idea that cars were going up in value. In this case, they tried to curb demand by increasing prices when everyone seems to have been doing the same. Countless dealerships added BS overhead as supply was so low last year. That's all changing.
Sure, but cutting prices 20% on new ones means your asset you bought last week just depreciated substantially faster than planned.
I do find it interesting that with all the data out there, i find it hard to see a graph of prices over time for cars. not the instantaneous prices, thwy are ineascapable, but the trend and history.
Drove a Tesla for ~10 years. What a disaster of a vehicle to own. Great delight to drive, huge headache owning it.
People get attached to bad ways of doing things all the time. This was no different.
Sounds like people who are more committed to the brand than the product. Hyundai makes quality cars, Tesla does not... anymore.
People just started listening to him for some reason.
Hard to feel sorry for people blowing their budget on a car when they all functionally do the same thing at the end of the day
This happens in concert tickets, airlines, even appliances all the time. Heck even housing - asking a new family to our neighborhood then telling them what you got your (very similar) house for 3 years (or sometimes even 3 months) ago...
Back then, the delivery time of a Model Y was only 3 weeks, ridiculously short compared to any other car or car brand at the time. Shortly after, delivery times shot up to over 6 months or more, and the price went along with it.
The price that I paid was IMO fair. I've had zero issues with it, it's much more fun to drive than the more expensive German car of my wife, I love autopilot for long distance driving (I will never buy or use FSD though), and 30k miles later, I've saved around $5k (ok, let's make it $3k) compared to using gas in the 2 years that I've owned it.
But I would never have bought it for yesterday's price of $65k.
It's probably a bit less than $5k, but still a good first-order engineering approximation.
edit: it's actually much less. According to the BLS inflation calculator $48,990 is equivalent to $55,282 now
This is still more than the top level trim of the VW ID.4, and comparable to the top level trim of the Ioniq 5 and EV6. Of course the range is still better on the Teslas.
However, there is a greater realization that for day to day driving 250 miles of range is sufficient, especially if you can charge at home.
For multi car households (common in the US), you can also have a secondary gas car for long road trips.
Nonetheless, a price war for EVs is good for their adoption, and hopefully also drives down used EV prices too.
If I go onto cars.com and search for new ID.4s in my area, they're listed between $47-55k. $47-64k for Ioniq 5s and and $51-69k for EV6s. Ok, $68,660, but still, that's an expensive Kia!
So it looks like Teslas are selling relatively better in the US than Europe?
We all know that Tesla's programming uses RADAR, I mean doesn't use RADAR because RADAR is stupid. I mean, we're adding RADAR back and removing ultrasonic, because ultrasonic is useless. Each time Tesla changes their feature set, they're changing their programming, and we have reason to believe it doesn't work as well as advertised.
Meanwhile, the other car manufacturers are basically putting in bog-standard RADAR + Camera + Ultrasonic suites from Mobileye, which basically has no issues.
I know Tesla fans just wanna pretend that their neural network training will solve everything, but surely they have to understand that the feature set / inputs into that neural net need to remain constant? Like, you can't just add RADAR, then remove RADAR, then add it back again, and hope that the training continues to improve.
I don't think neural nets solve everything mind you. But 'if they did', you surely have to at least have consistent training data.
------------
And btw: Phantom Braking is an issue on all Teslas, since they all have emergency auto-braking and FSD is "just a software unlock" (ie: we know FSD is representative of the emergency braking software's quality).
IIRC, Autopilot / FSD / etc. etc. was Mobileye back in the day, until Mobileye fired Tesla as a customer. That was when Tesla began to write their own in-house software, and I don't think it ever matched the quality of Mobileye... despite the hype.
If I ever bought a Tesla, I sure would not buy nor trust any FSD. You can say the same about a lot of other such "badly implemented features" in many products from other companies as well - a good comparison includes that depth as well.
That said, EVs are very much compressing what "top level" even means because even cheaper EVs perform better than more expensive ICE cars.
Its... gotten quite sad how bad the Tesla interior is. Meanwhile, real luxury cars with actually cool technology are putting augmented reality head up displays on the windshield.
https://www.audi-mediacenter.com/en/electric-suvs-in-the-pre...
does it come with working electronics yet?
Sometimes I wonder whether he still would be chewing me out for trying to deep-dive into EV sales. Just food for thought.
Possibly with their manufacturing decisions (a couple of really big plants making only a couple of varieties of models, with the models not changing much from year to year) they'll be driving unit costs way down such that they can reduce their sales price and keep their margins.
If it's a bad bet they're sitting on a lot of stranded manufacturing assets. If it's a good bet they'll look pretty smart.
Their unit prices have historically had pretty dynamic pricing both up and down, though in the past 18-24 months it's mostly been up.
Obviously Tesla will still be valued at premium even compared to the legacy car makers who transitioned successfully to EV (and that makes sense from a financial perspective e.g. high debt levels and various other obligations). But it really made no sense for Tesla to have a higher market worth than all the other car manufacturers combined..
I'm of the opinion that TSLA's stock has largely dropped due to Elon Musk selling $40,000,000,000+ worth of stock over the last couple of years.
Look at every major TSLA price drop. They coincide with Elon Musk's sells. Ex: Elon Musk's December 14th filing (https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000089924322...), or Elon Musk's November 11th filing (https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000089924322...), etc. etc. Feel free to search SEC's "EDGAR" database for Form 4, Tesla and Elon Musk.
Now line these up with TSLA's stock price. What pattern do you see?
When a "whale" sells huge amounts of stock, it just causes the price to drop. No matter what the fundamentals are.
--------
Now "why" is Elon selling TSLA stock? Is it just to fund Twitter? Or is Elon cashing out of TSLA because he's losing confidence in it? Hard to say, its not like the man is very honest about his intentions (and he shouldn't be).
But its always a good idea to keep an eye on the actions of the insiders and how they trade.
OP:
> The Model 3 dropped to $43,990, a $3,000 reduction.
https://www.tesla.com/blog/35000-tesla-model-3-available-now
> February 28, 2019
> $35,000 Tesla Model 3 Available Now
https://electrek.co/2020/11/16/tesla-stops-selling-35000-mod...
> Nov 16 2020
> Tesla stops selling $35,000 Model 3 with new 2021 model year refresh
As far as inflation goes, Dec 2019 to Dec 2022 is about a 15% increase, which would bring the equivalent of that $35000 car up to $40500. This $3k price drop still leaves a more than $3k gap in inflation-adjusted price.
Imagine if it had launched with inflation included. Here's your $35000 car, for only $38500. I don't think people would have been happy.
Why does the article above say "available now" February 28, 2019?
Oh, the model 3 in general launched in July 2017. But that didn't include the $35k version.