Only goes to show that "Climate controversy" only exists for people willing to throw their reputation on the trash for good amounts of money
Of course there are plenty of attention seekers willing to do just that
Of course there are plenty of attention seekers willing to do just that
> + Of course there are plenty of attention seekers willing to do just that
Calling someone a clown/attention seeker makes it seem like it's some unavoidable trait.
Let us not remove agency from them. Let us not confuse ill-intent with foolishness. At some point there must be some form of world climate trials reckoning.
Talk to an old biker and he may swear that CO2 is good for you.
Have you ever seen someone get defensive at the mere mention of a topic? Eg. that the planet is over-populated and that reducing the population is one of the best things we can do to save ourselves? Well, some immediately enter solution-mode and they talk as if you are arguing for gas chambers (or something equally idiotic).
It's quite draining to talk to people when you know their worldview does not allow a conversation about something. But it's also important to understand how it happens, and that you cannot do anything. Now I wish I could find that lecture, but I couldn't. Finding these gems amidst all the junk on the Internet is a challenge.
I do care, but I can't think of any objective reasons to care. Only romantic reasons about humanity, descendents, future generations, etc. It gets philosophical.
The people saying it may not think they're calling for gas chambers. But thats just because they are ignorant.
If you want to do the sums, just assume no one is ever born ever again and plot out the population for the next 100 years. Note that half the planet's population is under the mean age of 30. Life expectancy is above 80 if you exclude death in childbirth (which we just abolished in this thought experiment).
Unless you actively start killing people it's not going down fast enough to make any difference in the timescale we have for climate change.
And if you do want to start killing people, you'd get the most bang per buck by starting in America, then other rich Western nations. So I'd be very careful about putting this meme out there in case you find yourself on the wrong end of it.
i certainly witnessed that here during the depths of the pandemic questioning the reward and talking about the consequences of lockdowns! I think you'll find the same level of defensiveness all over the spectrum of climate change. People really want what they hold dearly to be true.