Congress says the Army can’t spend $400M buying Microsoft HoloLens headsets
theverge.com
theverge.com
However it's clear we are years and years of development away from this actually being relevant over conventional tools. It really seems like were just giving money to Microsoft for developing what will ultimately just be internal patents going towards consumer or business facing products in the nearer term.
Even simple things like repackaging and ruggedising COTS hardware to pass shock/vibration standards, weatherproofing it for a range of adverse conditions, etc. is a reasonable cause to add "military grade" markup.
Also, I think the sticker shock is there but it depends on the value it brings.
If it's well-justified to bring a major advantage, then it's acceptable. Otherwise it looks like MIC wasting $$$ on toys when there's unmet social and health needs that are desperately underfunded.