I haven't used IndexedDB in a while.. but my recollection is that it is basically SQLite. Not sure I see the advantage of this above and beyond what IndexedDB is already providing. What are the pros and cons of each approach?
If you want relational tables, joins, aggregations etc, you want something like this (or the original Web SQL that was deprecated).
There is definitely a use case for it.
If only. It’s much closer to DBM than it is to Mongo.
SQLite, which has a SQL database engine, is, by definition, a relational database. IndexedDB is a non-relational, or noSQL, database. One can't be basically the same as the other :-)
IndexedDB seems like a whole bag of gotchas. SQLite + simpler browser provided file backing seems interesting to me.
Think Redis vs PostgreSQL.