Memory loss: Expert advice for improving memory and concentration
vox.com
vox.com
1. For memory: it's all about the strange. The brain is exceptionally good at remembering strange and weird events. So all the articles you read where something odd happens you'll probably be able to recall with photographic accuracy. One way to take advantage of this is to weave strange narratives throughout factual information you want to recall. It would probably be best if someone else did this for you so you'll know it's not fake and you'll automatically hang on to the story as an anchor point. The best part about this technique is it requires no effort. You will automatically prioritise remembering the information. No additional effort needed.
2. For concentration: it's paramount you consider your motives. Since this is hacker news the main reason people might want to optimise concentration is to work harder. They fear that they're 'not getting enough done.' Maybe in severe cases they won't be able to start work at all. The trouble is: the harder you force yourself to work, the less time you have to recover, and the sloppier your work becomes. Believe it or not -- the ones who are able to achieve exceptional output are also the ones who aren't overly-attached. They can deliver whether things are going good or not because they're always emotionally in a good place. When you care for yourself better you really can do amazing things. Software engineering can be very demanding so I do think this is the right approach for most people.
This was the biggest work related epiphany for me. Had to almost burnout to realise this.
There is no one recipe but for me self-worth is inferred from the love of family and close friends. Work is just something meaningful I do as a side quest.
Don’t attach your self worth to a successful or failed couple of dates, and your results will improve.
Only read it once, (or heard it; maybe from Huberman?), so no idea if it's true or not.
Exercise and good sleep are far better than some cherry-picked exercises that this article says I need to do, and will have many more benefits. Here are the "Neurobiological effects of physical exercise" from Wikipedia [0]:
> The neurobiological effects of physical exercise are numerous and involve a wide range of interrelated effects on brain structure, brain function, and cognition. A large body of research in humans has demonstrated that consistent aerobic exercise (e.g., 30 minutes every day) induces persistent improvements in certain cognitive functions, healthy alterations in gene expression in the brain, and beneficial forms of neuroplasticity and behavioral plasticity; some of these long-term effects include: increased neuron growth, increased neurological activity, improved stress coping, enhanced cognitive control of behavior, improved declarative, spatial, and working memory, and structural and functional improvements in brain structures and pathways associated with cognitive control and memory. The effects of exercise on cognition have important implications for improving academic performance in children and college students, improving adult productivity, preserving cognitive function in old age, preventing or treating certain neurological disorders, and improving overall quality of life.
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurobiological_effects_of_phy...
Now, is this actually bad? I have no problem remembering what I actually need to remember to do novel research or to cope with the complexity of large programs. So it's not that I can't remember, but that I don't make any effort for things that don't matter. My feeling as I get old, is that it gets a little harder to learn new stuff because my head is already pretty full, but it's not too bad. But would it be worse if I actually remembered all those books and movies?
Of course the burden of the selective mind is the need to relearn things like me with names (among others). The certainly tens but perhaps hundreds of thousands of names I met in my life makes my brain forget all names (name of a particular person) I first meet in 10 seconds now. I just pay no attention without being aware of not paying attention, it is an automation. I need to use names several times, repeatedly to become a reliable filament of the inner network forming my consciousness and the representation of the world I live in. Those who are important and part of my life will unavoidably be imprinted and solidified in my memory, the rest without use dropping out for good. Old names fading into grey like the balls of memories in the movie Inside Out.
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20160125-the-blessing-and...
A blessing and a curse is how I'd imagine it too. Great for some stuff, but this quote highlights the curse part of it:
Viewing the past in high definition can also make it very difficult to get over pain and regret. “It can be very hard to forget embarrassing moments,” says Donohue. “You feel same emotions – it is just as raw, just as fresh… You can’t turn off that stream of memories, no matter how hard you try.” Veiseh agrees: “It is like having these open wounds – they are just a part of you,” he says.
I can remember drives I have taken years and years later. Going fast is my thing and has been since I was 6 years old. However if you ask me about my first organized Formula Car race: I have virtually No Memory of those 20 or so minutes of my life... I remember the warmup lap and the green flag but thats about it.
It took a while and a lot of effort but yes I did eventually dominate on the track. I won races, poles, fastest laps and I was offered the chance to turn pro... I mention this only to give credence to the oddities that Stress and/or Fear have on memory.
So now when I hear reports of Police in shootouts Not Remembering what happened... I UNDERSTAND.
I think a bit of stress is healthy for retention.
I don't know how much my memory got better but as a side benefit I got a great meditation technique for when I feel overwhelmed with my thoughts, or cannot sleep. I just have to recite one character silently and all the brain resources that would be wasted to feed my stress will go into the activities of recalling, visualising and enjoying the poem. It's the greatest stress relief method I found.
For me, that turned out to be correct. I used to jokingly refer to myself as 'name-blind'. Now I intentionally focus on people's names when they introduce themselves to me and I can usually remember just fine.
I grew up in a small community where everyone knew each other and, of course, knew everyone's names. When I moved out, I sort of assumed that I'm expected to know the name of everyone I've met (like I did before) and so I did. Over time I came to the realization that world is full of people I casually meet once or twice and then never see again. This completely changed my world view from "everyone you meet is super important" to "these people don't really matter that much". I think I went a little too far with this, because now I don't seem to remember even the names of people at my work who I meet occasionally, but not all the time. I sort of think along the lines "either they or me will move to some other job eventually and we will never see each other again so there's no point in trying to memorize their names".
I generally am bad at recalling labels compared to 'content.'
Knowing I need a better system for remembering names, I suppose I should try harder to uncover one.
And yet here you are, invalidating my experience.
> people who are bad at it likely just aren't trying very hard.
which rather ignores the differences in how people's brains work. The person you're replying to says they're definitely not remembering names well because of any kind of effort they put in moreso than you might.
There may be many reasons why someone can't remember somebody's name. And not trying might be one of them, but invalidates all other experiences people have.
My friends say I always run into people in public. The thing is that I instinctively remember faces of people I met, not at a first glance, but if I met them maybe 3 times or more. I will recognize them on the street, from afar, 10 years later.
Because of my ability to recall people's faces, even with aging changes, I have a much higher chance of running into people I know in public, than somebody who can't do that.
However I can't remember names for the life of me. For one I have an attention problem. Even if I try to listen to people's names when they introduce themselves, in many cases I won't hear the name. The other is that I'm very forgetful with names even after learning them.
I have worked with people for years, but a few years after leaving that job I won't remember their names. I will recognize their faces though.
I wouldn't say people don't try hard enough to remember people's faces.
Maybe you are: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_recogniser
Turns out he had sleep apnea. If you too sleep poorly consistently and are older or overweight, maybe get this checked...
Bad sleep is terrible for your brain.
One thing mentioned—making everyday events more memorable—is good advice, just not for memory.
As always, the best thing for your mind is physical health. Eat well and exercise. Do things things that make you happy. Sleep. You don’t need brain training games.
Edit: use article language
Why do you need to apply all of this conscious effort to "strengthen memory" if other people, or yourself previously, could easily remember the plot details of most movies you had watched, names of peoples you had met, etc. without ever having to think about it?
> How many times have you walked away from a conversation having no idea what was discussed because you were distracted by your phone? “You can get impoverished memories for past events because you were never really there in the first place,”
Maybe we used to be more "present" in the past, and therefore formed better memories? And now, with constant distractions literally at our fingertips our brains have less and less opportunities to form "sharp" memories as there is always a distraction pulling us away. And, as time goes by, due to lack of training and/or laziness, our brains actually get worse and worse at forming proper memories even when a distraction-less event is encountered?
Just a hypothesis.
Also just a hypothesis.
Why do you have to exercise in your old age when previously, when you were young, you were comparatively fit without trying?
Biology is full of "use it or lose it" because maintaining any ability or skill costs energy.
Once we reach maturity evolution basically stops “caring about us” (that is an anthropomorphism)- our systems are left “on maintenance mode”, which in evolution’s case means “luck”. Some fortunate souls might preserve their natural memories until they reach 70 or 80, but most people don’t, and for some the “maintenance mode” comes super early, because biology isn’t exact.
That said, I also think that nature is part of it but nurture also plays a role. The human brain is incredibly flexible. You can partially overcome or at least delay the worst of your memory loses with the right environment, and you can also squander your natural gifts and succumb early with the wrong one.
People also develop the mental infrastructure to index particular kinds of information. Part of it is luck, part of it may be genetics but most of it is training. For example chess masters can easily remember chess games. Musicians can easily remember musical sheets. And some version of this is going on in most people.
For example I can learn new Chinese characters relatively quickly, because I already spent years memorizing some.
The thing that most people don't realize is that neuroplasticity is competitive, and developing highly specialized abilities in one area actually negatively impacts your abilities elsewhere.
I spent some time over the Christmas break reading a few books on Neuroscience as the brain is a topic I for some reason keep on coming back to. Among them was "Cognitive Neuroscience of Memory" from Cambridge University Press, and looking it up now in Chapter Three they talk about studies comparing London taxi drivers with controls and noting down differences. To quote the relevant paragraph(s) "they found that taxi drivers had changes in the size of only their hippocampus, with a relative _increase_ in the amount of gray matter within the posterior hippocampus and a relative _decrease_ in the amount of gray matter within the anterior hippocampus. Moreover the changes in both types of hippocampal gray matter correlated with the length of time they had been taxi drivers, which ranged from 1.5 to 42 years (with the largest changes for those who had been taxi drivers the longest.". And also this one: "The investigators also found that the taxi drivers were worse at copying a complex drawing from memory, and a subsequent study from the same group observed the same result and also reported that the taxi drivers were relatively worse than control participants at learning object-place pairs and word pairs (they also reported that the taxi drivers had average IQs). These behavioral deficits may be due to the relatively smaller size of the anterior hippocampus in London taxi drivers. Thus, although the taxi drivers had superior memory for navigating London, it appears to have come at a cost for other forms of memory."
[0] https://www.normandoidge.com/?page_id=1259
[1] https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cognitive-neuroscience-...
The idea that size matters in terms of neuroanatomy is problematical. I distinctly recall that there are people missing entire regions of the brain who have no impairment whatsoever.
I would be especially interested in whether people apply this technique to stuff different from memorizing lists/sequences.
Its about chemistry and behavior, not about wishes and hand waving. People need ACTIONABLE advice. For starters:
1. Modafinil 100-200mg (not every day)
2. Vitamin B complex 50mg
3. High fat diet, lots of eggs
4. No THC
5. CoQ10 100mg
Each of those is demonstrated to influence cognition in multiple research setups, in humans and animals. Some consider Alzhamier to be diabetes type 3.Also, virtually no side effects.
It's fairly well tolerated and widely prescribed for narcolepsy, and used off label as a 'nootropic', or cognitive enhancer.
Ironically enough, the rate of adverse effects might actually be comparable to Advil, and modafinil has a noticeably lower median lethal dose.
https://neurosciencenews.com/omega-oils-reading-memory-child...
" New research has found no evidence Omega-3 fish oil supplements help aid or improve the reading ability or memory function of underperforming school-children."
Fish oil supplements may not improve memory
https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/fish-oil-...
Omega-3s Don't Seem to Affect Brain Health
https://www.livescience.com/36456-omega-3s-fish-oil-brain-he...