Until "self driving" is good enough that you're legally allowed to ride it drunk, it should not be allowed to do anything more complicated than radar cruise and lane-keeping.
Until "self driving" is good enough that you're legally allowed to ride it drunk, it should not be allowed to do anything more complicated than radar cruise and lane-keeping.
Other self driving implementations e.g. Cruise, Waymo have LiDAR which is an additional and in my opinion necessary sensor for detecting objects.
Because in this case it sure looks like a phantom breaking issue.
Anyone know how much a LiDAR system cost nowadays?
https://www.motorsafety.org/us-government-investigates-1-7-m...
https://www.macheforum.com/site/threads/phantom-braking-expe...
https://www.chevybolt.org/threads/ok-lets-talk-phantom-braki...
The focus on perfection rather than improvement is surprising to see on HN.
All those examples just reinforce my point that it's a necessary sensor.
On the other hand the sooner we get FSD cars, the sooner we will also get ASI and with it potentially the end of human kind.