Companies are under no obligation to follow short term profits, that an US myth.
Also, if you are in a market with very few participants there is no healthy mechanism of offer and demand. These companies are able to dictate prices at will, and that can be price gouging (which is why Intel entering the gpu market with a competitive product would be so important, three vendors is better than two).
CEOs live and die by them though.
Also, they have the perfect excuse now: "you see dear members of the board, we're in a global economic recession, that's why GPU sales are low, not that we priced them way too high compared to previous generations".
A real example of price gouging would be a store charging a hundred dollars for bottled water after a hurricane, because people are desperate for it and can't get it elsewhere.
The situation in the gaming market is quite different. Gaming PCs in general, and high-end GPUs in particular, are luxury items, not necessities. There are no longer any meaningful GPU shortages, and there is an enormous secondary market that people can use if they don't want to pay the new prices.
Plus, these cards are the GPU equivalent of supercars -- looking at the Steam hardware survey, the number one GPU is the affordable RTX 1650, which only recently supplanted the 1060. Is Ferrari price-gouging because their cars cost more than Toyotas?
I guess you mean GTX 1650.
"Affordable" is a relative and vague term; 200 EUR in my area for my target interest HDMI2 and DisplayPort (UHD 60fps HDR for video watching and desktop work).
I'm waiting for a price around 100 EUR.
Now you hear that GPU sales are hitting lows they haven't been at for a while. The fear is that making a PC game would be targeting an old market, meanwhile consoles are affordable. But if fewer games are made for PCs then there's less reason for people to get gaming PCs too.
It will miss that next generation of would be pc gamers. If the new gen is priced out, then consoles become more attractive, which means less games are made for PC, which then creates a chicken/egg problem.
Are they?
The term gets used a buzzword now for anything people want that costs lots.
Plenty of people use the term to talk about non-essential products.
A demand shock is exactly what increased prices here, and now a failure of competition is letting the duopoly keep profit margins extra high.
While consumers still demand the latest cards at these prices, they will stay at those prices.
The duopoly isn't new, but they got a much better opportunity than usual to spike prices.
An unhealthy, uncompetitive market would not have such a notable rate of improvement of the products as we see in the GPU market.
Plus, if it's competition you are concerned about, the situation is improving! Intel is getting into the discrete GPU market too.
To be fair, frames per dollar have been roughly stagnant for a couple of years. It's just that now you have the additional option of paying more dollars to get more frames. This is an unusual situation, but it is what it is. The AMD 7000 series is (so far) not better value than the AMD 6000 series. Same with Nvidia. That's odd.
This is very true for graphics cards BTW, and why Nvidia tried to lock card out of being used for crypto. They believe, I would think, that it was in their long term interest to cater to PC gamers and not crypto miners.
I'm getting price gouged when I buy SPY stock then, and gouging someone when I sell it.