Safe to say, we're still not there yet.
P.S. also in PCW, a great magazine in its day, was another article about a program that could keep compressing files repeatedly to make them really small. I haven't see that yet, either.
Safe to say, we're still not there yet.
P.S. also in PCW, a great magazine in its day, was another article about a program that could keep compressing files repeatedly to make them really small. I haven't see that yet, either.
"Evidence-based programming languages" won't solve anything by finding natural-language equivalents for difficult syntax. What natural language will these equivalents be created in? English, Japanese, Arabic? All languages? Will Japanese programmers share their code with English programmers by means of a Babel fish?
The idea of a poorly designed language is nonsense. All languages that exist or have existed were designed precisely for what and when they were needed.
At its core programming is about appropriate abstraction. To be widely useful the programming language's wheels should tread lightly, just touching the road. If there's too much abstraction, there's no friction and you go nowhere. With too little abstraction you're pegged to the ground and expend enormous amounts of energy to go anywhere.