You are replying to someone explaining that their professional experience shows that the answer can be neither generalising anecdote because what works for one will not necessarily work for another nor simply broadly applying statitics because, to oversimplify, something which works perfectly for 20% and not at all for 80% as a terrible average rate of success but is indeed what you want if you are amongst the lucky 20%.
What are you complaining about in this take exactly?
I think this is a good example of misunderstanding the purpose of both science and medicine.
So doctors are looking for rare conditions in 1 of 10 people, where we all have rare conditions and a lot of them. We are walking bags of rare conditions. Thankfully there are direct to consumer While Genome Sequencing which is pretty easy to find your SNPs and look up which ones are attached to studies about being pathogenic.
I figured out that I have pathogenic TNXB mutation myself despite the gaslighting of many doctors for many years and WGS confirmed it.
It’s a totally different way of doing medicine that bypasses doctors.
Interestingly enough one of the treatments for my specific mutation is one sub class of anti depressant.