this is why I don’t think google is threatened by LLMs. 1) this doesn’t do links, and 2) it has accuracy issues. I don’t understand the hysteria about how google will be replaced by ChatGPT.
> A Google executive the Times spoke to but didn't name said AI chatbots like ChatGPT could upend the search giant's business, which relies heavily on ads and e-commerce found in Google Search. In a memo and audio recording obtained by the Times, the publication says CEO Sundar Pichai has been in meetings to "define Google's AI strategy" and has "upended the work of numerous groups inside the company to respond to the threat that ChatGPT poses."
https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/chatgpt-caus...
Is going to take a long time till Google is obsolete, esp. because a sizeable amount of people will still want to get links. But in a voice query situation, I'd actually prefer if I didn't have to interact with HTML at all.
What's the use case anyway ? Fact checking someone in a conversation ? Doesn't sound like something I'd pay for.
I haven't seen anything backing this claim though, https://www.searchenginejournal.com/openai-chatgpt-update/47... ran tests with no improvement.
It would be a simple classification problem to detect whether a prompt requires a more classic maths model. It’s it’s maths, use something like wolfram alpha, it’s it’s finance show random numbers, otherwise use a language model.
Add some relevant links on top of that and you are good to go.
Of course they also need to fix the confidence level and find a solution these AIs to say that they don’t know.
You do have to execute the python yourself somehow still, but even with just a super simple interpreter you can make your own math-enhanced LLM ai assistant