Amber Monitors (2020)
blog.solidsignal.com
blog.solidsignal.com
When I was an undergraduate in the mid '90s, my college had a row of terminals linked to the central university computer (which I think was a DEC Alpha). Most of them were green, but one was amber. That was my favourite, which I always used if I could. I liked the softness of it, compared to the harsh green.
So yes, I do miss amber monitors today. And as with all nostalgia, I suppose what I really miss is being young and discovering new worlds in the machine, but the particularity of the amber terminal resonates more strongly than I realised until I felt myself bristle at that curt dismissal.
https://github.com/Swordfish90/cool-retro-term
QED :)
Looking back now, they were probably DEC VT320s as seen in this LGR video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RuZUPpmXfT0
Heck maybe you can put it on-board as a color option in the OSD. (yes I know this is all possible with software like xrandr and redshift, thanks - having it done on the display side might give different results)
Somewhere about 15 units world-wide? Not a best opportunity..
> having it done on the display side might give different results
If you take an OLED panel with a good pre/post-processor for the text mode you can get a pretty good results, but who needs a real text mode nowadays?
But yeah, I have at least two ancient Android tablets and at least one with Windows, I would love to repurpose at least one of them as an amber display to show the status of the services.
Now, amber e-ink displays, that would be really interesting to see :)
In the mid/late 90s, I could find surplus Wyse serial terminals, mostly amber, some green, for $50-$100 in great shape. Every PC had a serial port but feasible dual-monitor setups weren't a thing yet. At more than one game studio, we'd run our debug printfs over serial to the amber screen while the game ran fullscreen. And at least one debugger could be configured to interact via serial for breaks, steps, and dumps. Fantastically productive. For the time.
Romantically or productively, to this day, the first config I make on a new terminal app is amber on black colour scheme. My heart glows amber. P3 phosphor forever.
For me the attraction was also the ubiquity of them. I studied in the mid 90s when the web was born and it made the X Terminals at college extremely popular so it was always hard to get one. The rooms full of text terminals are being neglected and it was great to always have one available. It made it something I could rely on to always be there.
Not long after that, larger grayscale monitors became popular for desktop publishing. they were often used in a portrait orientation and had higher resolution than the older terminal-style monitors.
By the early 90's full color monitors were cheap enough that they started to replace all of the monochrome and grayscale monitors.
Apple monitors started coming out in green. First non-B&W actual terminal I saw was a VT-220.
Wasn’t really until late 80s, early 90s the green and amber really started showing up everywhere. HP terminals liked amber.
There was a company that was trying to sell amber monitor for Macintoshes. This was around the same time folks were selling head mounted mice. I didn’t feel either was a particularly good idea.
The monitor on the TRS-80 was a cannibalized black and white television. Cost was probably a big factor in using white for many of those systems.
I do miss them, but only in the sense that if I had to pick a monochrome display for some reason it would be at the top of my list probably.
RGB #FFB000 (255, 176, 0)
Nouveau IBM https://www.fontpalace.com/font-details/Nouveau+IBM/
To approximate amber now on an RGB display, you have to light up subpixels of differing values. It isn't the same because now you're mixing red and green light together.
More accurate to use just green instead because there is no light mixing with that, but it's still going to be only a subpixel and not the entire pixel. Probably easier to use silver for monochrome because then all 3 subpixels are used.
I liked amber monitors very much. They were comfortable.
Also, the green phosphor Apple and at least some other vendors used wasn't a pure #00FF00 green -- you'd have to light other color channels. This picture is a pretty accurate representation: https://www.reddit.com/r/retrobattlestations/comments/btaokj....
I do own this exact monitor, I should recap it one of these days. The plastic is very yellow now sadly.
Quite a lot of phosphor formulations existed: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phosphor#Standard_phosphor_typ...
What you may be thinking of is the persistence effect which is very long with the green phosphors.
I wish that I had known this before we blew a huge amount of cash on terminal emulation for our VAX. The worst was Reflections, which is over $500/seat (we didn't pay this much).
MAME's vt240 isn't amber, but it is free.
...and I still have some amber HP 700/92 terminals on our elderly PA-RISC HP-UX.
So it's pretty cheap to make a terminal from an old monitor, ps/2 keyboards and mice.
http://www.fabglib.org/classfabgl_1_1_terminal.html
There's also a LilyGo esp32 with all the right connectors already there for ~$12USD
https://www.tindie.com/products/lilygo/lilygo-ttgo-vga-v14-c...
The "invisible island" xterm guy really brags on the quality of his emulation, but it's just not a windows app.
We bought Reflections decades ago, and had hundreds of licenses, but it was telnet clear text.
On my recommendation, we pushed stunnel to all our clients, and made redundant stunnel server gateways on Linux.
Then a new boss said we needed to be on supported software, so we ended up on Bluezone Rocket. It was not Reflections, but it was not cheap.
Our VAX is already on an emulator, and I only learned that MAME would do a vt240 after googling for a free OS2200 terminal emulator (MAME uts20, not yet working).
We do have many museum pieces in my place of work. Have you ever tried to change directories in VMS? It's a long-winded ordeal.
I still have a hp-ux 10.20 at home for nostalgia but not the text terminals :'(
> The age of the amber monitor lasted from about 1987 until 1990, a mere moment in the history of computers.
I remember the first time I used an amber monitor. It was in a dimly lit lab at MIT in my last year there. It was 1973. The amber monitor was hooked up to a PDP-7, an 18 bit minicomputer, and the monitor only had 40 columns. It wasn’t the first time I had used a monitor, but before that most of my programming was on cards or teletype style terminals that typed output on fan-fold continuous paper.
This amber colored terminal used a primitive rasterization technique that didn’t have a fixed refresh rate so the frame rate slowed as more characters were needed on the screen. Despite the very long persistence of the amber phosphors the monitor flickered badly, and when too many characters were on the screen it would dim as the earlier lines would get harder to read, hence the dim room lighting. The monitor appeared to be some contraption rigged up by the EE department (which CS was just a part of).
After that, I would continue to occasionally run into commercial monitors that were amber, although most used green phosphors or white like the ADM-3 family and the DEC-VT100 [1].
Notably, I had access to the University of Illinois PLATO time sharing system in 1979. It used monochrome touch screen amber plasma display terminals at that time [2].
Studies supposedly showed that amber was easier on the eyes but I often found it a little dim. Computer users of the time, like 911 operators, often worked in darkened rooms to see the screens better.
If I recall correctly, one could also debug a DOS programs and print stuff on the Hercules while doing graphical or text UI on the regular VGA.
They were also less fuzzy. Its not just more pixels but less fuzz.
Tada, amber from the 80s. Among the first changes I make on a new Mac.
* DEC terminals at my school, all our grades and stuff lived in a VAX and the office personnel accessed it through VT220s or maybe VT320s
* the InfoTrac at the public library, late 80s early 90s. This was a search engine for newspaper and magazine articles that you could find in the microfiche section of the library. It basically consisted of a PC -- maybe XT or AT class with the entire search database on wonderful new things known as CD-ROMs. Text mode only, the amber monochrome monitor was hella stupid burned-in.
* one time my dad set up a Northgate 386 for his company with Xenix on it and it had an amber monochrome monitor.
No, it was longer. Earlier in the 80s until later in the 90s (for dumb terminals)
It wasn't so much about the price, but the picture quality. (Monochrome CRTs do not require shadow masks, but color CRTs do – and were therefor blurry. E.g., dithered color often blended into perfect renditions of the color in question. Well, there was also Trintron, but this is another story.) Also, consumer graphics cards were (originally) mostly for monochrome video, and color often required a dedicated card, as did a graphics mode, which both came at the cost of lower text resolution. (Eventually, these options merged into more general cards, but mode-specific restrictions remained.) Windows may have played a role, though, as it was then all about graphics mode (and color), anyway.
Also, I recall white phosphor as the least favorable option, for its contrast that was considered too high.
What, really? I had a ton of them growing up.
I've got an amber VT220 dumb terminal within arms reach and I have at least one amber CGA display in storage - the Packard Bell monitor I used with my Epson 286 as a kid.
I'm sure I gave it away in the end because 10 years ago, nobody would buy anything with a CRT in it, let alone a serial terminal.
Today I'm sure a retro computing enthusiast would probably pay a bit of cash for it.
I think the 320 was one of the nicest ones, it's really compact and has this old terminal look. My VT520 is technically much better but it looks a bit like an old PC monitor :)
They were even better than Atari and Sun station B&W monitors at the time, which were also very good. I wish there were a mostly B&W version of MacOS, where color is used only sparingly.
I believe one can coax macs into full grayscale mode via accessibility apps, and that's actually surprisingly good for focusing, although I am not quite sure why that is.
No, it was way back when the dot pitch accessible to shadow mask CRT hardware[1] was too coarse to display more than ~300 horizontal pixels well, so computer operators used monochrome displays where they could readably get 80 characters across a screen.
[1] Composite color encoding was another hurdle, though the C64 and IBM CGA got past that well enough. It wasn't until VGA monitors in 1987 that color text really broke through though.
But, between the green and amber (before I left), I got a 286 PC as a workstation to connect to the mini. Its monochrome monitor was white text with a very slight blue tinge. I thought that was the best :)
Also at the time I had one of those covers that increased contrast, it attached right to the monitor (no tape).
Personally I think green is fine. I never felt 2nd class using the green or grey/white units like the ADM5/ADM3A.
Using a decwriter demanded a bit more thought. I think my coding style got worse when I stopped having to plan my intent inside my head a bit more.
[1] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/67771985/119880097...
After seeing my friends' CGA PCs I marvelled at the "high resolution".
Fond memories of WordStar and XTree in Amber :)