> Questioning the established science is pro science provided it’s done in good faith and it looks like the parent is acting in good faith.

I see the opposite here, it's another take of outrage porn based on misinformation.

Good science would be having a hypothesis and doing scientific research on it. Science is based on hypothesis. It rarely gets to 100% but does work off of statistical significance. Whereas conspiracy theory regurgitation is based on opinion and story telling and does little to nothing to move science forward.