Paul Otlet's Mundaneum anticipated the internet [video]
youtube.com
youtube.com
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qwRN5m64I7Y&t=16s
Obviously he was thinking about more than a filing cabinet.
For those that would like to learn about its significance in context I recommend this talk: “Alex Wright - The Web That Wasn't: Forgotten Forebears of the Internet” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CR6rwMw0EjI&t=823s
I happen to be very interested in Hypertext, but it was only in 2016 when I actually learned about Douglas Engelbart and Ted Nelson. I thought I knew about them, having found some mentions of them, but that time I did listen to them for the first time in recorded interviews, I read for the first time their writings, not what someone wrote about them, and realized how much I did not know until then.
Once I realized that, I started looking for more information and some time later I learned about Paul Otlet from Alex Wright, but all that took a while.
This video by "The Tim Traveller” is, as the channel name implies, primarily a travel video and it is a pleasure to watch if you already know about Paul Otlet. But if not, what stands out is things like confusing The Internet with The World Wide Web, things that someone like me would just ignore while enjoying the good bits.
Card index systems as shown were not unusual in libraries or large offices. The difference here seems to be the global scope, collaboration in sourcing text, and the public access.
Mundaneum - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29449341 - Dec 2021 (31 comments)
Paul Otlet Envisioned the Internet Before Computers, Without Computers (2014) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22043441 - Jan 2020 (14 comments)
The Internet Before the Internet: Paul Otlet’s Mundaneum (2016) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21560749 - Nov 2019 (2 comments)
Old ideas come back as researchers envision a more structured Web (2015) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17327039 - June 2018 (6 comments)
The Future of the Web Is 100 Years Old - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10611015 - Nov 2015 (25 comments)
Mundaneum - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10104269 - Aug 2015 (2 comments)
Mundaneum - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9783046 - June 2015 (6 comments)
Dec. 10, 1944: Web Visionary Passes Into Obscurity - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=988008 - Dec 2009 (2 comments)
Amazing anticipation of the web from 1934 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=81030 - Nov 2007 (0 comments, but interesting)
https://redirect.invidious.io/watch?v=1sxUPxJsXZY
> collect the entirety of human knowledge in one place, and make it available to everyone. ... unfortunately, no-one had invented web servers or home computers yet. So instead, they ended up making the world's greatest filing cabinet
http://traite.czam.de/en/latest/otlet_traite_1934_FR.html
Those who attempt first, generate knowledge that we build on. Would the Wright Bros be anywhere without the bravado of earlier failed pioneers?
In fact, Wilbur flew first that day then failed, so then Orville went and that's the flight we remember. And they might not have gotten there at all without inspiration from the childhood helicopter toys of Pénaud, who I'm not sure tried to fly himself but it wasn't long after that a bicycle maker tried.
Corpses. ...and no disrespect intended, quite the opposite.
The Giants, on the shoulders of whom we stand, are probably all dead, now.
Those, still alive, go often unrecognised...until later.
Getting credit for something you didn't invent rather than the word you did is just tacky.
We're reducing the incredible collective work of millions of minds to the name of a single person and claiming they did it all. That's nonsense of course and every time you read into any discovery you'll learn all the connections that led up to it. Nothing in science, maths, or technology is the work of one person. Acknowledging this doesn't belittle the incredible work that your favorite scientist or mathematician did any more than pointing out that your favorite sportsball star plays on a team, by the way. It's just a more honest reframing.
On the other hand, famous names linked to discoveries is inspiring and simple even if it's not entirely true. Maybe that's why we do it?