‘Remember your training’: teen pilot makes emergency landing on Route 66
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
Flying in small planes is a huge thing, not just for fun or hobby. It has literally been going on for decades and an essential service in many cases. If it were as fraught as you make it seem in terms of actual statistics of the danger, it would not be this way, yet it is this way.
Do the statistics not show this to be the case though? I only know anecdotally that life insurance premiums go way, way, way up when one flies small aircraft.
In the same sense as sex is overrated. Shooting a hand-flown ILS approach right down the wire to minimums; pop out and see the runway lights displayed right in front of you. I’ll take that risk.
Spoken like someone who's never taken flight. Once you've flown a plane, you'll never want to not
Edit: wasn't specific about differentiating between small and large planes. I'm more keen on flying a large plane but small ones seem too accident prone
However, the corollary to this is that the biggest sources of risk are largely under the pilot's control and can be reduced through recurrent high-quality training. Careful preflight planning, setting conservative personal minimums, avoiding fatigue, and not accepting normalization of deviance come into play as well.
[1]: https://www.aopa.org/training-and-safety/air-safety-institut...
Will this nonsense never end? He landed a plane in a land-able scenario with good training. Props to him, this whole part about god tho is weird and I don't understand it - I have to assume that that "trust" gave him extra confidence to pull it off? if so, I guess I gotta give god a +1, but it seems redundant and overall full of pitfalls in general use cases.
First, I believe you may be over analyzing. It's a common phrase, typically someone isn't applying it in a rigorous fashion and inspect the definition of each word to apply a hyper-specific, qualified meaning.
Second, it's "nonsense" if you share the same assumptions, but not if your initial starting place is different. I assume you don't believe in God (please correct me I've misjudged), or if you do you have a conception where He doesn't intervene in the natural order, but that's not where everyone else comes from. If you believe that God intervenes in the world and you have a relationship with God then it makes sense to trust Him.
Third, from a theistic expression, I'm personally most familiar with Christian expressions in particular, one would trust in God because: one, God is a just judge, in a life and death situation where you will, to utilize a common phrase, "meet your maker," it makes sense to prepare yourself for that by entrusting yourself to "your maker". Two, by trusting in God you will calm yourself, you are able to resign yourself to do what needs to be done and be content with that because you are in right relationship with God.
I completely understand that if you don't understand the common phrases meaning or don't have the same beliefs, but then I don't think the "nonsense" would actually be the phrase used, it would be the prior beliefs that lead to it.
1. Was it merely belief in God that gave you these troubles or was it a particular religious expression? I worry, without knowing specifics but having heard similar things from both friends and strangers alike, that you are transposing a personal specific experience with an entire broad category (belief in God encompasses not only numerous specific religions but also philosophical theism, deism, etc). I say all of this because I don't see a logical, natural jump between belief in God, or even belief in common religious groups in the west, with the experiences you've experienced.
2. I am certain that certain religious expressions can be destructive, but that's not been my experience generally. Would you consider qualifying your statement in some way to reflect this? When I hear that "religion is destructive" it is so foreign to my own general personal experience, as well as when I've looked at it more broadly, that it's hard to accept. I've known people who's belief in God is something that gives them great joy, I know others who have had difficulties with various concerns (sometimes emotional or practical or philosophical), and others like myself who while believing in God don't get much positive OR negative emotional response.
I know I threw out a decent bit, and regrettably it's late so I haven't done any proof reading, so if there is anything you'd like to focus on in particular to narrow things down I'd encourage you to do so (or ask for clarifications if I wasn't clear).
If only some friends and I weren't born as 'abominations' then the culty religious organizations would've seemed more productive. Look even a broken clock is right twice a day. I still don't want broken clocks in my life.
Honestly I'm done with magical thinking, confirmation bias, survivorship bias, appeals to authority, and all the other tiresome phenomenon necessary to remain in any faith.
(This is coming from an agnostic)
it's just a different language - if you try to understand it as your own (with things being either real or not-real) it will of course sound as unintelligible as any foreign language
> “Honestly, I didn’t see them. I think that was divine intervention, moving those wires away from me,” he said.
If you read the article, he explains the reasoning.