I'd be interested in hearing how they're wrong to that extent, on such scale.
I'd be interested in hearing how they're wrong to that extent, on such scale.
Then again this is in contrast to NSAIDs like ibuprofen that can result in gastric bleeding even at the recommended dose.
I prefer paracetamol/acetaminophen for most uses but I’m pretty careful about how much and what else I’m taking.
If you forgot if you took your Paracetamol pill, accidentally taking another one would leave you with permanent liver damage.
It's like looking into the sun: normally, you flinch/blink away and are safe. But if you stare, and suppress or your reflex isn't working, you'll catch a life-long blind spot burned into your retina.
The therapeutic margin is just insanely small for anything OTC.
I’ve heard it said (by pharmacists) that paracetamol likely wouldn’t pass a clinical trial if it went through one with modern standards, though.
But if you were to tumble upon a magic pill that cures cancer, and you tested it extensively and indeed does so without any ill effect, would you wait to really understand the molecular mechanism of it before administering it?
Even if GPs wanted to prescribe a safer painkiller, they are hamstrung by drug policy. So, they choose something that is a short term solution but has long term consequences because there are NO alternatives that aren’t a headache (i.e opioids).