And then there is SHWEP, which is my favorite podcast: https://shwep.net/
And then there is SHWEP, which is my favorite podcast: https://shwep.net/
I'd love to hear if you have strong counterexamples.
Do you have proof you'd like to bring here, to back up your assertion?
2. Florentine Academy leads to art
3. Hermetic inspiration of Roger Bacon, Isaac Newton, etc leads to more science
4. Gnostic Mandaens seem pretty chill. Living community.
I suppose I agree that esoteric philosophies tend to emphasize personal self discovery over explicit doctrine. (Not always the case). That can lead to good or bad things. I’m surprised to hear such a negative take. Like, hard to believe they are worse than big time religions. Do you have examples?
But what I really mean is that it is destructive from a moral and societal standpoint. These occult schools (and really I am talking about anything blovatsky or crowley inspired, or adjacent. Rosecrucians, OTO, hermitic order of golden dawn, etc) promote a view of moralitt that is objectively selfish in the truest sense of the word. It makes people on confused and makes them pursue things which are not right. In the more serious cases, it completely ruins a persons moral compass. Effectively grants someone permission to behave like a sociopath ubder the guuse of "true will" orother magical bullshit.
I'll acknowledge that hermeticism, gnosticism, thelema, etc are not going to be everyone's bag, and that's just fine. However....
That's a rather large overgeneralization of some quite disparate philosophies. Also, you may be working with a mistaken idea of what "will" means in this context. A person's will is (very roughly) their optimal place and trajectory in the world; it is not just following some desire or doing what you want. It is not ego based. Wills harmonize and do not clash. The flip side, and perhaps more importantly, it is wrong to interfere with someone carrying out their own will.
An additional perspective: "Will" is one's personal, bedrock Truth of Self. You exert your Will on yourself, not on others.
Anyway, this isn't quite the negative that you seem to be implying.