One thing that's not clear to me is whether Litestream+SQLite works in-memory. If Litestream wrote to disk on the primary node, but kept the full DB in-memory for facilitating reads, I can definitely see how it would be a lot faster than Postgres (as the author claims).
Though I'd also like to know if any RDBMSs have been designed for that use case, as I'd imagine traditional DB optimizations have been made for high incidence of disk access that would no longer hold true if the entire DB was in-memory