So available battery/desktop dimm power usage is not the right maths to be using here.
I’m not saying they aren’t exaggerating or anything, but in general marketing information is always technically correct, even if you would not get that perf in real life so outright falsehood should indicate your base assumptions can be wrong
I'm also super-skeptical of AMD's claim because their chipsets have a very long history of sucking a lot of power.
This really is a case where the CPU vendor (AMD) needs to get involved with the hardware partners to get good drivers made FOR LINUX to showcase their hardware, and not just windows.
The real reason devs love having Apple laptops isn't OSX. It isn't Apple the brand. It is somewhat the quality of hardware... but the real reason is that it is IT-supported Linux.
Looking ahead to the seemingly inevitable, AMD and Intel when pushing ARM (or RISC-V?) CPUs, will need to formally adopt good linux support for the hardware.
An instruction set changeover cannot succeed through non-technical consumers in Windows. It won't in games. The only beachhead for AMD/Intel in non-x86 will be a good Linux laptop. Otherwise Apple will have the advantage.
That is why the OP specify 99Whr, it is the maximum battery size in laptop limited by Airline regulations.