Then they complain to national papers that workers aren’t hustling enough to get into leadership.
There will be volatility as a new generation takes over at companies. Each generation is larger and more educated than the last so demand will keep up.
Then they complain to national papers that workers aren’t hustling enough to get into leadership.
There will be volatility as a new generation takes over at companies. Each generation is larger and more educated than the last so demand will keep up.
I conspiratorially believe this is an intentional move to limit wealth transferring from boomers to younger generations as it normally would in the past, by houses being passed down and grandma dying and leaving stuff to youngins, because now all that is taken by "old age homes" instead of the younger generations.
I guess it implies all. To clarify, the cohort of retirement-age workers with the means to retire is experiencing a sharp rise as predicted. That contributes some to a worker shortage that should absorb those affected by layoffs like these.