When should you eat is just as important as what you eat
nationalgeographic.com
nationalgeographic.com
When it comes to weight loss (and when the right muscle sparing tools are in place, also fat loss) total Calories in vs Calories out dominates. Don't get fooled, both sides of the equation are moving targets so it's been extremely difficult to be precise with it even in research. and water weight changes add further confusion.
When it comes to other hormonal aspects though? meal timing matters, obviously. An extreme example that makes it obvious -- If you eat ~1500 calories from fats/carbs in one sitting, you're likely gonna want a nap in short order as your blood sugar and insulin excreted rise. Does that mean you'll gain weight? Depends on your caloric needs.
Another example -- Eating even 3 hours before bed time can affect sleep. So, for sleep quality, it's best to eat earlier and then stop.
Another example -- taking in caffeine blocks the clearing of adenosine (the feel tired hormone). So if you drink caffeine in the first ~90minutes of waking then you dont actually clear the adenosine as well, and then when the caffeine hits it's half life (about 6 hours later) you'll feel tired again. Solution: let your body clear adenosine naturally before you consume caffeine.
> So if you drink caffeine in the first ~90minutes of waking then you dont actually clear the adenosine as well, and then when the caffeine hits it's half life (about 6 hours later) you'll feel tired again. Solution: let your body clear adenosine naturally before you consume caffeine.
That is a very specific claim. Your cite is about caffeine antagonizing adenosine receptors, but what the comment above is talking about is that caffeine slows your body from clearing adenosine in your blood which is very different.
I'd like to read a cite about the above quoted claim. Simplying googling "adenosine and caffeine" doesn't immediately support it, because again "antagonizing adenosine receptors" and "dont actually clear the adenosine as well" aren't remotely the same claim.
https://podclips.com/c/why-andrew-huberman-avoids-caffeine-f...
https://www.reddit.com/r/AdvancedFitness/comments/qaq6z4/dr_...
Sources should be in the show notes of the corresponding podcast episodes.
Anecdotally: I can tell the difference.
If it's not a peer-reviewed published research (actually, multiple) it's not credible.
It doesn't mean it's wrong, but presenting it as a fact like the OP did is wrong and potentially extremely harmful.
Nah, c'mon, Most of us are unqualified to synthesize the dozens (if not hundreds) of sources it takes to be an expert in a field. Saying podcasts and reddit is the same as no source is like saying "People are no source" -- it entirely depends on the person.
> Andrew D. Huberman is an American neuroscientist and tenured associate professor in the department of neurobiology and psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Stanford University School of Medicine
That's a decently trustworthy source to trust for physiological information.
I mean, do you force your GP to provide sources and then go read them before you take their advice? Even if you do, it's not advisable for the majority of people.
It's akin sayin "he's developer for 10 years, clearly nothing he said about software is wrong", which would get you laughed out of the room
Sources should be in the show notes of the corresponding podcast episodes.
https://content.iospress.com/articles/journal-of-alzheimers-...
despite the title, it is commonly cited re caffiene vs adenosine.
the [PDF]is here:
https://content.iospress.com/download/journal-of-alzheimers-... [PDF]
A bit informal but gets the gist across: eating outside of a 12 hour period (which begins at the first meal of the day) causes increased fat uptake, lowers insulin sensitivity, and your muscle starts to waste.
When equated for calories, protein, and fiber (and their "Calories Out" side effects) there is no statistically significant difference in diets from the twinkie diet[1], keto, low carb, low fat (though not too too low cause of hormones), one meal a day, 12/12 or 16/8 or 5d/2d intermittent fasting...
The results are that I’m in the best shape and health of my life.
Best of luck and health.
One of the Keto-Doctors on youtube suggested that you can still eat gouda cheese if you feel seriously hungry, but should avoid sugar and carbs.
If I'm in the mood I drink kefir before bed, a certain kind seems to give me slapstick zombie dreams. If I have cream cheese with a certain gut-flora supplement, I might have space-dreams, where I fly space-crafts.
When I was younger I'd eat ice cream before bed. People were always dismayed, certain that it would give me nightmares. But that never happened. I just started gaining weight and no longer keep ice cream in the house.
If your goal is weight loss, you should concentrate on the time of year - not the time of day.
The 3 months between the fall equinox and the winter solstice (Oct - Dec) are the most difficult for dieters. Not because of the holidays, but because nature is preparing you to hibernate.
The best period to start dieting is between the winter solstice and the spring equinox (Jan - Mar). Each day tends to become easier to control your eating.
The period between the spring and fall equinoxes (Apr - Sep) are usually the easiest to maintain healthy eating habits.
Yes, there can be exceptions, but if you chart your daily weight, you will see the pattern.
The good news is that NOW (Jan) is the best time of the year to start a diet. Don't put it off because at this time of the year nature will conspire to assist you.
Thanks for the (non-paywalled) link.
We don't really snack in the evening, maybe a small chocolate (as in a nice one from a chocolate box) at about 8pm.
We both sleep better and I have certainly lost a little weight. I would probably say I'm also less hungry in the morning too.
It's a routine that works really well for us, we are in the kitchen doing food for the kids anyway so why not eat with them or at least cook at the same time (they get big lunches at school). It's also opened up our evenings a little for more hobbies (and occasionally work).
On the other hand, animals are normally the most insulin resistant during their typical sleeping hours.
Studies suggest the same phenomena occur in humans. It turns out that mealtime has a big effect on what
happens to your blood sugar levels. If you eat the same meal in the morning and at night, your blood
sugar will increase more in the evening than in the morning. Eating the same meal early, like for
breakfast, and at night can affect blood sugar levels differently.
So the time will change your blood sugar levels. If your blood sugar levels are fine, and the foods you eat don't skyrocket your blood sugar (low-GI for example), this isn't an issue. Eat low-GI foods at night to prevent insulin from increasing your blood sugar and stopping fat burning. (Some cardio before bed and before your meal might be helpful too, for a number of reasons) Fat cells also appear the most insulin sensitive early in the day, with a peak at noon; they are about
50 percent more sensitive midday than they are at midnight. This means that your body is primed to eat
at certain times. In fact, eating at the “wrong” time can throw off everything. In a study of mice,
those given access to food at the “wrong” time, when they typically sleep, ate more when food first
became available—10 percent more total calories during a day—and gained more weight.
So watch your portions, and change the proportion of fat you eat so 50% of it from a night-time meal is eaten in the morning. Research is starting to show the same effects in humans. One study on weight loss that compared the
times of eating among participants over a 20-week period revealed that those who ate lunch earlier lost
more weight than those who ate it later. A related study found that those who ate later burned less
energy than those who ate earlier.
So eat your least-caloric-intense meal at night, like a salad.The whole article seems to send the wrong signals. What you eat actually seems more important than when you eat it, based on this article. IMHO, you should focus on your nutrition first, weight loss second. Keeping weight off requires habit-forming. If eating later at night is more convenient for you, do it! Just do it smart.
It is better for your health to eat earlier than later. The worst time to eat is at night.
While an ideal time to eat isn’t given, it’s probably somewhere between 8am-1pm.
Intermittent fasters should take note rather than discounting a reproducible body of evidence as "propaganda". Its possible to do IF on an early schedule.
I'm considering inverting my IF schedule. I typically eat 1-2 meals today. Some days, I won't eat my first and only meal until 5:00 pm. Other days, I'll eat my first meal later in the afternoon, at about 2:00 pm and then again at about 6:00. Through IF, I've been able to shed about 20 pounds (160lb to 140lb) and sustainable keep it off.
However, I miss eating breakfast with my family, especially during winter, when a warm bowl of porridge...just hits the spot. So, I'm really considering during winter time frame, to switch up IF to an early schedule and experiment a bit.
"Our review of the literature suggests that there is little evidence to support the notion of endurance training and fasting-mediated increases in fat oxidation, and we recommend that endurance athletes should avoid high intensity training while fasting"
Then you go to sleep and your body suppresses hunger overnight, and in the morning, it’s much easier to eat less or skip breakfast completely.
Weight = calories - burned energy
How you limit the calories or burn the energy is up to you.
Having an average daily American intake all in one go right before bed or spread out equally among 5 minute intervals can't be as bad as a diet mostly consisting mostly of deep fat fried chocolate bars at average American meal timings.
And they don't tell us when to eat either.
It's just another article about "there is a correlation in mice" and continue with a bunch of truisms for good measure.
> Research is starting to show the same effects in humans. One study on weight loss that compared the times of eating among participants over a 20-week period revealed that those who ate lunch earlier lost more weight than those who ate it later. A related study found that those who ate later burned less energy than those who ate earlier.
Big question on this one: Was it testing the same people, or was it observational / correlation-seeking? Because I can imagine people who burn less energy in general eat later because they're not hungry, rather than the other way around.