SBF's Lawyers Ask Court to Conceal Identities of $250M Bail Co-Signers

"The letter application dated 1/3/2023, DI 29, to redact names and identifying information for certain bail sureties, was granted by the Court without prejudice to any application to release the names and addresses, unless otherwise ordered; any such application shall be made by motion filed no later than 1/12/2023."

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66631292/united-states-...

"Without prejudice" seems to assume the government might oppose the redactions at some point in the future. What are the chances of that.

There are four financially responsible parties (FRP) that agreed to sign off on SBF's release. Two are SBF's parents, one is another undisclosed family member and, as indicated by handrwitten note, the fourth is an undisclosed non-family member. The later two bail sureties must sign by January 5, 2023.^1

https://ia804708.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nysd.5...

1. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/sa...

Thanks @dragonwriter for the correction. The two "secret" sureties are signing bonds for lesser amounts. I had assumed these two additonal sureties were required because the equity in SBF's parents home would be insufficent to secure a $250M bond. According to this motion, the amounts of these two other bonds have not yet been determined. They will be less than $250M, that's all we know.