It’s a question I get quite frequently and sure, sometimes it’s not super handy (think airplane seats or hotel beds) but otherwise this is who I am and I kinda like it.
Other than that, the article seems pretty weird with a lot of assumptions on benefits of being small(er). The calorie intake one especially, I know a lot of smaller folks who consume a lot more food than I do...
Btw. travelled a lot, took numerous flights (I remember good times where you could be upgraded to emergency row for free), 30+ hours bus/train journeys (India/China) while travelling and honestly travelling is not an issue, door frames and clothing/shoes are much worse. I remember hitting my head multiple times in narrow apartment hallway this summer vacation where AirBnB owner had great idea to put sticking sharp top side of hanger furniture around 190cm height, even proposed him in review solution to just cut tennis ball and put it on corner of furniture, which will be appreciated by anyone above 190cm in future and it solves issue for less than a euro.
FTA: https://www.thoughtco.com/optimal-kitchen-counter-top-height...
>Be aware, though, that these design standards are aimed at making things comfortable for average people, who are 5 feet 3 inches to 5 feet 8 inches in height
(women average 5'3" and men 5'8" in the US)
At 5'11", I find that any long prep sessions in the kitchen create a lot of mid back pain and so I have to use multiple thick cutting boards to raise up the counter level. It would be awesome to have a prep table sturdy enough for kitchen use that could be easily raised/lowered like a standing desk.
I think the author is just frustrated with her height. Why else would she write such a long article.
I have a friend who is 7', he basically can't fly.
Being tall, or larger, isn't all that it's cracked up to be.