"I can’t speak for other disciplines, but within computer science, I’ve always felt that these meta discussions were inadequate — in terms of volume, vigor, and format. They happened mostly at conferences were largely limited to more senior/well-connected researchers, and lagged behind some of the serious problems that have accumulated such as restrictive publisher copyrights and very low acceptance rates at journals and conferences."
So, the claim here I noticed was:
"some of the serious problems that have accumulated such as ... very low acceptance rates at journals and conferences."
So, a big topic in that community was a "serious" problem getting published. So, I outlined how to get published. Simple.
In a word, my outline said to 'mathematize' CS. That suggestion is potentially earth shaking, likely not already in the community, and should be a welcome contribution.