Something often said: 'We don't use the word crazy around here'. I'm sorry but bandying around that word is vague and misleading. Authors really need to be more specific. This is why we have distinct terms like ADHD, Neurodiverse, Eccentricity, etc.
Disagree. Seems like a useful word and the article title conveys its meaning quite well. The multiple interpretations of 'crazy' are exactly what makes the title interesting. Crazy looney or crazy like a fox?
I think the gist is that people who think differently are often thought insane, but are also disproportionately the ones who will stumble upon new and useful ways of doing things.
Neurodiverse, that’s just leftist propaganda. It’s like calling someone “vertically challenged” or something equally silly. People use the word “crazy” in this context and we all know what it means unless we are very pedantic or completely unaware of words having meanings other than the most literal, dry definitions. But if you read English in that way then articles like this are not for you, really, which is not an attack. It’s just there for most people, we want to read more engaging content that something that reads like a 1970s instruction manual.
Be careful with the redefinition of words, as it's a basic 101-mind-control-technique.