How Startups and a Government Agency Were Fooled by a Convicted Thief
muckraker.me
muckraker.me
It's more interesting the dispute was about alleged failure to disclose when the relevant paragraph of legalese seems to assess the termination fee for any reason at all:
"5.4 Should for any reason either party withdraw from the negotiations due to information that would hinder an investment being discovered by the Investors or should the Investors withdraw for any reason after the date of this letter, the Investors shall be entitled to recover..."
"We decided we don't like the deal" is a reason. That phrase "for any reason" is the proverbial hole you can drive a truck through.
The perpetrator in this case happened to be an actual fraudster-in-sheep's-clothing, but even among friendly business partners, contracts are drafted for the maximum benefit of the author. If you have any doubt whatsoever about whether a clause puts you in jeopardy, strike or rewrite it until you're 100% sure you're not getting fucked.
Just to be clear: I am not talking about myself, or anyone that I personally know. I know of a case kind of like this, though.
That's why most contracts are actually made with a parent on behalf of the child.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_majority http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacity_(law)
(IANAL, TINLA).