Hacker News Reader

Comment by mshake2 | Hacker News Reader

Simply "disagreement" implies that there are valid opinions and perspectives to engage about. What we have now is a culture so polarized that you are literally evil to the other side if you disagree. We can't afford to have simple disagreements because if the other tribe destroys you, you need your tribe to support you.

For example, name something of real political consequence that it is acceptable to disagree about. It is a struggle to come up with a single example.

View on HN

> For example, name something of real political consequence that it is acceptable to disagree about.

"What is the most impactful way to ensure that everyone has sufficient clean water and nutritious food to survive? Would approach X or approach Y or approach Z save more lives? What other alternatives should we be considering? What are the tradeoffs and risks here? How can we hedge our bets to protect against those tradeoffs and risks?"

Reasonable people can and should have interesting conversations about how best to solve problems. Those arguments could even get heated, but at the end of the day, the person you're arguing with is aligned on key values with you, and just disagrees on how best to fulfill those values.

> Would approach X or approach Y or approach Z save more lives?

I take it you missed the stories about people being assaulted in public for wearing masks.

Or not wearing them...

Or the people called fascists for not wanting to wear them.

The political talking points are unfortunately not that sophisticated. It’s largely about how twitter is run by a cabal of SJWs silencing the freedom to post Hunter Biden’s dick pics or fantasies about the liberals who will throw a tantrum if you say their pronouns wrong.

>Hunter Biden’s dick pics

This is generally a good tell that someone isn't willing to engage with the other side at all, and instead intentionally reduces a story about powerful organizations communicating strategies with each other (I'm not passing judgement here on if those activities were wise or should be allowed), and instead reduces it to a revenge porn story.

There's a much more interesting story there about how technologists should build systems that inevitably get the Eye of Sauron put upon them. It's not about Hunter's penis unless you want it to be.

I tried reading the twitter files and it seems to be all smoke and mirrors. Twitter has a clear rule about not sharing hacked information, which this falls under. Besides that point, there’s not even really proof this laptop exists. The evidence is mostly claims fabricated by the New York Post. Hunter Biden probably had his iCloud hacked instead of dropping off a sensitive laptop at some random repair shop where the laptop was intercepted by someone close to Tucker Carlson and then magically stolen in transit to Fox HQ.

All of this aside, since when is it a crime for a company to hire someone close to a politically powerful person as a consultant. How can you reasonably write laws against this or prove that this led to Ukraine having any political leverage with Biden. The DNC is also allowed to send requests to have nudes removed from Twitter. They didn’t command Twitter with a gun to their head. They requested just like Trump and friends regularly did for content they didn’t want which was respected as much as the requests by the DNC.

>Twitter has a clear rule about not sharing hacked information, which this falls under.

This sentence tells me you're lying and have not actually read them.

I thought it was about Biden's dealings with foreign powers, and possibly being beholden to them.

Or saying that it’s run by a white supremacist.

Or the woke left insisting on declaring pronouns

Have you ever been outside? I’ve lived in “woke left” cities for years and worked with a lot of “woke left” individuals. Never in my life have I seen someone get angry about pronouns or call someone out for using the wrong pronouns. It’s a fantasy invented to pit the working class against eachother.

You're just proving the point of this thread with the hostile question "Have you ever been outside?".

Your life is not representative of the lives of others.

The burden of proof is on the people making these claims that entire cities/cultures are overrun with SJWs screaming about pronouns. If what they claim is true, it’d be pretty unlikely that my personal experience is what it is.

SJW do get their knickers in a twist about pronouns. Do you disagree or agree?

Now you've introduced the part about entire cities being overrun so I'll leave that to you.

It does seem like people take extreme opposing views just to be contrary.

Maybe it's a way for them to take control of their lives.

I don't really know.

The anti-vax movement is an interesting example of divisive positions.

Because “of real political consequence” implies that it’s pretty damn important. You should be able to disagree about political things like tax structures and heath benefits without anyone getting hurt (my friends certainly have such disagreements). But if they get legitimately racist or sexist etc, it’s reasonable to start questioning their sanity and trustworthiness.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com