The Blind Spot | Hacker News Reader

The Blind Spot

thegauntlet.substack.com

20 pointsjcpst13 comments

Implications of this are huge. Another that comes to mind is how many businesses have been left in shambles after their owner had died.

There was a thriving coffee shop here in my neighbourhood and after the owner (42 y/o) had died of covid it's close to collapsing now.

We'll need much more to recover from this than we had hoped.

> It’s glaringly obvious that an extra 1,000 deaths of individuals over 50 every single day for nearly 3 years would have an effect on the electorate…

COVID killed older and more vulnerable people disproportionately. I’m curious how much this cannibalized the typical mortality rates (categories?) for these groups. That is, what percentage of these individuals would have died over those two years anyways? I imagine this has been studied but I can’t find any sources (and the internet is full of conspiracy junk on this topic.)

Is it statistically significant at all? Or is it truly an extra 1000 deaths per day?

(I’m not implying it would be so significant as to change the point being made… I’m intuiting maybe a few percent)

People really overestimate the mortality rate for people over 50... here are the actual mortality stats for the US: https://www.ssa.gov/oact/STATS/table4c6.html

On average, a 50 year old is going to live another 30 years. Even a 74 year old is going to live an average of another 12 years.

People tend to think that average lifespan works like "take average lifespan, subtract your age, and that is how long you can expect to live" This isn't true, however, as you approach the expected lifespan of the population as a whole. Most people alive will keep living for a while, even if you are pretty old.

Even an 80 year old is likely to live another 8 years on average.

So yes, increased mortality for old people kills people who would be alive for many more years on average.

Very true. But that doesn’t account for people with existing conditions. I imagine I could just see if there’s any noticeable dip in non-covid causes of death… Though I suspect those numbers might double count depending on how the data is counted. Ie. SARS-COV2 killing a cancer patient is probably counted as multiple causes of death.

Though, again, I reassert that I’m not expecting it to be a big number. Just curious if it’s even measurable.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.10.11.22280963v...

> IFR of COVID-19 among non-elderly populations in the pre-vaccination era is substantially lower than previously calculated (4-8,59), especially in the younger age strata. Median IFRs show a clear age-gradient with approximately 3-4-fold increase for each decade but it starts from as low as 0.0003% among children and adolescents and it reaches 0.5% in the 60-69 years old age group.

Great piece. Hard to ignore these impacts. Healthcare collapse is underway here in Canada

It would be nice if child tylenol was on store shelves so that Parents dont have to goto the emergency.

> From the airlines, to healthcare, to education, to restaurants, every industry that requires workers to be in-person, face-to-face with customers, has seen drastic issues with staffing since COVID began. Those staffing issues worsened when masks came off. This is precisely the outcome public health experts warned of when “the urgency of brunch” was pursued as national pandemic strategy.

This seems to be the thesis. What I don't see is a link to anything demonstrating that masks played a material role in controlling the pandemic.

By now, it's very common for people to know of others who have contracted covid despite multiple vaccinations.

Where are the clinical data showing efficacy of current vaccines against contracting and spreading covid?

Just another mask crusader.

An agenda piece, nothing more. Look at her byline.

The word "mask" appears 14 times in this article.

Probably correlated with it being an article related COVID & public health?

Weird. Lots more articles mentioning masks since 2020. Need to do some analysis on that.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com