Yes but that doesn’t mean you won’t need new architectures or training methods to get there, or data that doesn’t currently exist. We also don’t know how many neurons / layers we’d need, etc.

The brain itself is infinitely more complex than artificial neural networks. Maybe we don’t need all of what nature does to get there, but we are so many orders of magnitude off its redonk. People talk about number of neurons of the brain as if there’s a 1:1 mapping with an ANN. Real neurons have chemical, physical properties, along with other things probably not yet discovered going on.