How Jeff Bezos advertised for the first Amazon employees (1994) | Hacker News Reader

How Jeff Bezos advertised for the first Amazon employees (1994)

geek.com

51 pointsheelhook27 comments

The ad on mi.jobs: https://groups.google.com/group/mi.jobs/msg/d81b6c1fa8f361fc

I like that Bezos posted it at 1:31 a.m. local time.

What is up with the terrible street naming around Seattle? N.E. 28th Street? Not just 28th street? And it's one block south of N.E. 28th Place? There's an S.E. 28th Street further east?

How did anyone get around this place before GPS?

Pff, try "1st ave", "1st avenue south", and "1st ave N.". Yup, 3 different (albeit connected) streets in Seattle.

bellvue ave, bellvue court and bellvue place intersect in cap hill.

to answer the OP, those directionals are required to uniquely identify addresses in Seattle: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Street_layout_of_Seattle#Direct...

note that they're prefixes for east-west streets, but suffixes for north-south avenues.

I've lost deliveries before when I've omitted the directional, even if the street #/street name was unique to the zip code.

I wonder whether any GPS can parse addresses like 123 W E St out in Shelton. Not to be confused with 123 E St SW in Auburn. As a deliverator before GPS was common, figuring out how to look stuff like this up in a Thomas Guide was pretty entertaining.

It's actually fairly logicial once you're used to it. It's just a quadrant grid system. Streets run east-west, avenues run north-south. The center of the city is approximately somewhere downtown, streets go out in a radial fashion from downtown.

I invite you to come to Europe [1].. :)

1: https://maps.google.com/maps?q=Cologne,+Germany&hl=en...

2nd Ave North and 2nd Ave West run parallel to each other, two blocks apart.

I don't think a compas was much help for navigation, or at least I don't think one was consulted during the naming process.

I've never been to Seattle, but coming from Europe I found it very logical when I visited Grand Rapids, MI earlier in the year. There, they append a compass point on each street depending what area of the city it's in - Lake Drive SE, Wealthy St SW, 28th St SW and so on. It took me a little while to fathom, but it turned out these main thoroughfares keep their name right across the city, so the compass points help you keep your bearings.

I love your grid systems (and I'm sad enough to sit and look at maps of them for hours) - I find it really difficult to get lost in the USA. Everything's just so logically laid out when you're used to European maze-like towns and cities. My small English town (11,000 people) is easier to get lost in than a city the size of South Bend or Grand Rapids.

I have exactly the opposite reaction. I can't stand the grid. I love cities I can get lost in. Streets that wind and wend are my favourite; ideally with a mix of canals and shortcuts. Wide, broad, straight streets are to my mind inhuman: built for grandeur and ego of despots in old cities, for cars in new ones. I like pedestrianized streets on a human scale, with organic layout and a mix of residential and retail. My home town of Galway, Ireland approaches the optimimum of small size that gives walkability and scale that gives diversity. Larger cities can be and often are formed like constellations of such smaller towns

In that case come visit Greenville, SC. Small but it looks like someone sneezed on a map and drew the road lines from there. It's chaos but you get used to it.

I love getting lost in cities too, but if I'm in a rush nothing beats the simple "streets go this way, avenues go that way" grid of NYC. (that's just what I say in my head with matching hand motions)

That's only actually true between 14th and 187th streets in Manhattan. The other (80%? 90%?) of NYC has locally consistent, but globally inconsistent, street layouts.

Wow I never knew that. Very interesting... It seems to be a global thing. Guess not!

>coming from Europe

Well, coming from Europe, _anything_ would make more sense. We lived in Brussels for two years and after six months we bought a TomTom in order to preserve the marriage.

Roads change names every 100 yards, signs are waaay up on the corner of a building, and street maps are mostly useless.

Most cities in the U.S. (outside of the 'old' north-east -- Boston, Lower Manhattan) are laid out on a grid. Numbering systems in major cities are laid out in conjunction with the streets (eg: "3200 N." on every street is at Belmont Avenue).

When we moved back, the TomTom became a neglected device at the bottom of the glovebox.

As a Grand Rapids native, I agree with you for the major streets. 28th St, 44th St, Fulton, etc. Some of the smaller streets are nightmares with the one-way system (Lyon/Fountain) and roads that should connect but end abruptly only to pick up again the next block over with the same name (Barclay/Bostwick).

Don't get me started on roads that change their names every few miles (Northland Drive is also East Beltline is also Broadmoor is also 3rd St (and later 4th St) is also Federal Rd is also County Road 599 is also M-44 is also M-37).

Your point still stands compared to European roads or larger unplanned cities, but we've got a long way to go before we reach truly logical road names.

Why not submit the original RRW post instead of the one from Geek.com?

My guess: OP saw the link in Kevin Ko's blog post on "Startup - one year in" (also on HN front page), where Kevin Ko mentions the geek.com article in a Yammer post he did.

I like the last paragraph "So next time you see a job listing for a new start-up, just remember Amazon started the same way, and that new listing might just be for a company that turns out to be the next Amazon, or Facebook, or Google."

It could also be the next 'pets.com'

So next time you see a job listing for a new start-up, just remember Amazon started the same way, and that new listing might just be for a company that turns out to be the next Amazon, or Facebook, or Google.

I think this is a little hopeful. Sometimes I'll look quickly on Craigslist just to see if there are any local projects, and there are always at least a handful of job listings read very similarly to Bezos' ad...

I wonder whether this post views as stereotypical to you guys, like it's said in the comments @geek.com?

I personally don't think so, as I haven't seen a job ad stating that kind of performance threshold.

I think in the context of 1994, there probably weren't many people posting jobs like this. But nowadays, literally tons of posts on Craiglist say the same thing as Bezos.

But it's just reality to me. People often point to one thing and make generalizations.

What's up with the "well-capitalized start-up" part? I vaguely remember Bezos working in finance and using funds from that. Who else financed Amazon?

and not once did he use anything approaching an ego term like "rock star."

This reeks of "rock star" ego:

"...and you should be able to do so in about one-third the time that most competent people think possible"

The problem with that I feel is that it really asks more about your perception of your abilities rather than your abilities.

Someone who has come from a background where they hung out with the top of their MIT class probably doesn't see themselves as too much above average.

Whereas somebody who was the dogs bollocks as some crappy diploma mill probably thinks they're the best thing ever.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com