I'd argue that's less the AI being biased, than the AI's human-imposed restrictions being biased. Once you get around those (and it is not difficult to), you can get it to write an essay on pretty much anything, from any viewpoint.

I got it to write a pro-fossil fuels essay, and it gave some pretty typical pro-fossil fuels talking points (here's some excerpts):

> In contrast, renewables are often hampered by their reliance on weather conditions, and they require complex and expensive infrastructure to be built and maintained. For example, solar panels can only generate electricity when the sun is shining, and wind turbines only produce power when the wind is blowing at the right speed.

> In contrast, fossil fuels have a much lower ongoing cost, making them a more cost-effective option in the long run. This is especially important for developing countries, which may not have the resources to invest in expensive renewable infrastructure.

> The construction of solar panels and wind turbines requires the use of materials such as concrete, steel, and copper, which are extracted through processes that generate significant greenhouse gas emissions. In contrast, fossil fuels like coal and oil are already extracted and ready to use, reducing their overall environmental impact.