Coins Stolen from Wallet
github.com
github.com
https://corporate.ford.com/articles/community/ford-driving-s...
Similarly, my bank provides information on best practices for avoiding phishing attacks.
Real people reuse passwords. They forget passwords. They accidentally get a virus on their computer. They get tricked by fraudsters.
Crypto's main selling point- complete decentralization- means there is so fixing mistakes, no means to undo fraudulent transactions. Real people don't want that.
Ironically, if crypto was stable, it would better appeal to the general public. However, it would lose ground with its current user base.
The paradigm is incorrect. This generation of crypto will all, eventually, fail.
Frankly it takes the inconvenience of cash and couples it with technology the vast majority of its users could not accurately describe. If that's not enough, it's unusable for peer-to-peer payments without an immediate cash-out.
Crypto must be built around utility. Utility leads to stability. Stability leads to adoption. I'm not anti-crypto. I'm anti-whatever-the-fuck-this-is.
The solution for all these and crypto, is education.
I disagree. Educated people still make mistakes, and still become victims of fraud or viruses. A blanket statement like "we just need to educate people" is a nice way to say "no one would have this problem if they were as smart as I am". But the reality is you're just as vulnerable to a zero day or a well-executed scam.
There are many solutions. None are perfect. If you ask me, demanding everyone never make mistakes is a very poor solution compared to using systems that have failsafes.
There are always going to be people who have bad things happen as a result of being misinformed, as much as there are always going to be failsafes that yet still fail.
In both cases, more and better education is a positive force.
There's a lot of braindead crypto hate on HN, but these are very real and salient points.
I work in IT. I have to reset people's passwords after a 3day weekend. The other day, an employee typed their password into a phishing email because the real person they were emailing got compromised in the middle of their email exchange.
Crypto banking is simply a nonstarter for these people. There was an article on HN about how scammers cost 10B$ last year. A bank where mistakes are permanent and irreversible will never be mainstream.
If I store money in a mattress, and someone breaks in, I can report that to the police. Deposits in banks are federally backed - if there are bank hijinks, my savings are protected.
Crypto is worse in most ways (or overall worse) every way than what we already have. /edit
Too strong IMO. You could argue most ways or overall worse, but not "literally every way".
Edited.
It’s too complex, doesn’t allow for offline transactions and when it does the transaction has nothing to do with crypto (e.g. exchanging offline wallets) or it’s so convoluted and complex that almost no one can understand anything about it.
It’s tries to do too many things at once, currency/unit of account, an entire transactional system, system of record etc. And ironically any use cases that even have a shred of being actually adopted by the wider financial industry are to replace systems like swift not as a currency.
Anytime anyone asks about what the advantage is over the current monetary system and the current financial system any explanation becomes a 2 hour lecture, if you can’t explain what the advantage is in 2 sentences there isn’t one.
> what's the problem with blocking it and returning the funds
> What's the point of seeing all existing transactions if they can't be stopped and reverted if stolen
Sounds exactly like the what the average person would think of crypto if it went mainstream.
Or if a bug in the bank’s software meant you could lose your life savings.
Or if no transaction could be reversed, even in the case of obvious offline fraud?
All these things and more can be found in the incredible world of crypto.
There are also several security features to extracting money from my account: there's an account number, name, physical access to debit card, ccv, account password, OTP, pin numbers. All of which are missing in the typical crypto ccy net.
Furthermore, banks are forced to record identity information from their customers making it difficult for a nefarious actor to conceal their identity.
One advantage for crypo ccy is potentially making anonymous transactions. I don't really have anything to hide in that regard. The mundane shop at the supermarket, ebay or even buying drinks at the pub.. nothing very revealing.
If your life savings are at risk from losing a secret key or simply by someone nicking your secret key then I'd call this a "bug".
All the risks associated with holding onto it is worth it to me. Anonymous transactions are not interesting to me personally but complete sovereignty is.
The chances of someone guessing your key are very low. But if you are worried about that then you put the funds into a multi-signature arrangement.
It certainly takes time to understand these things but it's worth it for the benefits it brings. Nobody can steal or tax your funds against your will. If it takes 6 months for an average person to wrap their head around all the concepts it's not the worst thing in the world. It takes 6 months, at least, to learn how to operate a tank. But it does slow adoption rates.
Which bank is this?
Why wouldn’t they be able to reverse the transaction?
What do the police say?
Obviously she has contacted the police? as (unlike crypto) the police can get involved.
As far as I know, successful SEPA transactions are impossible to reverse. She was tricked during a weak moment into confirming via 2FA what she deemed a legit transaction, but as far as I can tell, she was on a fake banking website. The bank can claim willful negligence, which is hard (but maybe not impossible) to disprove.
If you want a third-party (bank) to secure your cash so you can do that with crypto, but then you're also exposed to the counterparty risk that comes with it. But that has nothing to do with crypto or fiat or whatever. If you don't trust yourself with managing the keys, put it on Coinbase or Kranken, centralized banks. If you want full control, put in your safe, i.e. manage your own key.
There are also decentralized alternatives that offer something in the middle, e.g. smart contract or social recovery wallets.
If crypto was cash, it would be the worst form of cash imaginable.
I posit that crypto isn't cash, or if it is, it's the worst form of it.
Literally yes. You go to law enforcement and, if they can figure out who stole it, the law allows for the return of your property.
there you go
We maintain the blockchain, which facilitates the transactions, nothing more... If we had to revert your funds, we would have to convince the entire ecosystem to roll back the blockchain, to prior the block that moved your funds, and every transaction made since along with it... Not only that, it would then be a matter of fight between you and the thief of who got the first transaction out of your wallet...
OP used his private key/mnemonics somewhere else and that's equivalent to giving your bank account + password to other people and then complaining when they take your money.
So… not sure why all the hype on cryptocurrency. It often doesn’t do what they advertise they do, and neither does the market want them to do it…
I.e should lorries be banned because house robberies would be impossible without them?
3% to 5% of the entire fucking world's GDP.
Cryptocurrencies are a tiny drop in the bucket. Tinier than tiny. Completely insignificant in the grand scheme of crime.
Organized crime existed way before Satoshi Nakamoto released Bitcoin to the world and shall, sadly, continue to exist long after that.
First google of (only) bitcoin value is 320 billion USD.
How much theft occur in bitcoin every year? I don't know. It is not insignificant by any imaginable measure though. And the amounts are absolute staggering.
It is a new avenue.
If you didn't instantaneously realize that that's a ridiculously low number, you're way, way too ignorant to be commenting.
Market cap is also quite different from GDP, because market cap measures (sort-of) wealth. It’s like comparing the value of your house compared of your yearly income
96 trillion in Swedish is confusingly enough "96 biljoner" and me not even noticing it was in Swedish.
Yeah I know the comparison is bad. My main point stands though.
3-5% of world GDP equivalent value being tied to organized crime could be possible, but seems like a low value, based on how many entities do you include into "organized crime": do you include all the rogue/terrorist states, do you include Russia, do you include money laundering banks like HSBC or ING, do you include tax evasion/fraud schemes (Double Irish With a Dutch Sandwich, or just a plain McSandwich [1]), do you include wage theft, and so forth.
[1] McDonald's to pay France $1.3 billion in tax fraud case https://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/mcdona...