> Thirty-four Indonesian scientists signed a petition questioning the motives and methods of the Hilman-Arif team. Archaeologist Víctor Pérez described Natawidjaja's conclusions as pseudoarchaeology.
What matters more than petitions is actual surface luminescence measurements.
I would still rate this group as more reliable than pseudo archeologists with a political agenda.
A very current example is Younger Dryas Impact deniers. (Note that doubting the Impact actually caused the Younger Dryas cold spell does not by itself make one such a denier.)
> Younger Dryas Impact
Is a hypothesis a not somehow proven fact. Barely even a theory.
Interestingly, the picture he drew even looks like a volcano.
https://www.sciencealert.com/the-world-s-oldest-pyramid-is-h...