(30 mins with explanations)
I found it really interesting and fun.
(30 mins with explanations)
I found it really interesting and fun.
By the way, the test really isn't all that interesting IMO. The results were extremely predictable, in my case at least.
"The biggest correlation we found between gender and any one personality trait was r=0.42, which means that gender explains 18% of the variability in that trait. Another way to put this is... if you knew a random person's score on that one personality trait, and you tried to guess that person's gender using just that score, you'd mispredict that person's gender 31% of the time!"
They think that's low! That's crazy high for just one trait, it would be called "Highly significant" in any paper.
Edit: Nevermind, you can leave the email field blank.
No, it doesn't. It says that there are striking differences in the distribution of personality traits between the sexes, and does not take a stand on the source, besides that it is “certainly” a mix of biological and social contributions.
As gender identity, in the current population, correlates very strongly to “sex” [0] (less than 2% of the adult population reports a transgender, nonbinary, or other identity divergent from their “sex” assigned at birth), any strong gender-based personality difference would also be associated with sex, and vice versa.
[0] a misnomer for what is more accurately an externally-ascribed gender; biological sex is multidimensional, the binary division of “sex” by a subset of sex traits is an imposed social construct.