Europe's postal services: France reduces deliveries, UK and Germany now outliers
telegraph.co.uk
telegraph.co.uk
If they can’t provide the service they agreed to, return it to public ownership, and pay some amount towards the bail out.
I remodeled my house a couple of decades ago and never installed any mailbox. The post office apparently returns any letter sent to that address, labeled "vacant". Instead I go pick up my mail (sent elsewhere) every six or weeks or so if I happen to be nearby.
At least in the UK and Australia where I have lived the majority of parcels come via the default carrier e.g. (royal mail or auspost).
>Royal Mail chairman Keith Williams... said first-class stamps will have to rise “considerably” to pay for Royal Mail deliveries on Saturday.
>He said: “The cost to us is driven in part by [the fact that the] volume of letters has declined. You're delivering the same number of letters over six days when you could be doing it over five. So that is forcing up stamp prices.”
This is the same argument Royal Mail always trot out. It conveniently ignores the fact that, while it's true that people are writing and sending less letters than they used to, the volume of other 'stuff' being sent through the mail has gone up about eleventy billion percent in recent years, thanks to the amount of online shopping being done.If Royal Mail can't turn a profit in this kind of market, they shouldn't be in business.
Who knows why the UK Gov seem so keen on keeping it