Here's one of the tweets mentioned in the article that was labeled as "misleading":
https://bucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.am...
Can you explain what is actually misleading about it, or, more broadly, how is it anti-vax?
https://bucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.am...
Can you explain what is actually misleading about it, or, more broadly, how is it anti-vax?
Probably the moderator didn't analyze the case thoroughly enough to understand the cherrypicking bias and marked it as misleading. It's not like you have scientists analyzing every tweet to find the scientifically biased views.