Absolutely right but the fact still stands that we have no valid data to paint it as a fact that the data of the entire population is compromised. It's a communication 101 that you never communicate in absolutes if you can't verify your findings.
So we can reasonably assume that biometric data of those two population groups was leaked by left behind devices. Not the entire population, but the two most sensitive groups. Sounds pretty bad imo.
:)
Glad we're all nice to each other in this corner of the web!
Even "Der Spiegel" or the Washington Post would dissagree on this statement.