That logic is most likely simple, elegant and wrong.
Thrombotic complications are frequent in COVID-19 and contribute significantly to mortality and morbidity
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32857878/
One of the special characteristics of this disease is that it may predispose patients to thrombotic disease both in the venous and arterial circulation.
Given both the vaccine and the virus can cause myocarditis or pericarditis, and given that the only thing they have in common is the spike protein, I'm curious as to where you think I went wrong.
And that cardiac events in both cases are a minor part of the greater effects and dangers of catching the disease.
So it's about not focusing on the wrong things
Do you have a citation or evidence for that statement? Estimates for cardiac vaccine injury are in the 4-5% range. Your statement would imply that 40% of people infected with Covid would have cardiac issues. The evidence in low vaccine rate countries (or Africa) contradict your statement (no where near 40% of the population is getting cardiac issues).
So that is a failure of the same kind of logic that you're trying to employ. You have a virus with a clotting issue and a vaccine with a clotting issue, and they both only share the spike protein, and we know for certain now that isn't the mechanism.