How to Sell Your Startup
bilalmahmood.medium.com
bilalmahmood.medium.com
- Acquisition price. The smaller the $, the quicker the process can be.
- Who’s the champion. The higher up in the org the acquiring champion is, the quicker the process can be. (Eg Zuck acquiring WhatsApp took just days)
- Regulated industry. If the acquirer is not in a regulated industry (Eg banking), the quicker the process can take.
- Competitor acquisition halo effect. Eg did Coke just acquire a Coffee company, that will put time pressure for Pepsi to do the same.
And just because an acquisition can be quicker, doesn’t mean it will be quick.
Also keep in mind, there’s a higher chance the acquisition will fall through than to actually complete. If the acquisition does complete, there will likely be an earn out period of 12-24 months.
https://jacquesmattheij.com/how-to-sell-your-company/
It's a while ago but as far as I can see most of it still applies today.
I might be alone on this (I don’t see it mentioned often) but I think I’d consider it very lucky if they only wanted 2 of those 3. A huge part of why I started a company in the first place is to not work for someone else, and selling myself back into a job seems like the opposite of a win!
It doesn’t seem very common for sales to happen without the founder sticking around though. I’ve assumed this is because buyers do in fact mostly want the founder as an employee, and either aren’t willing to do the deal without that, or the offer is so much lower that it’s not worth selling.
Typically there's a reason to keep founders around and it's not related to their output, but more as a figure head/tacit acceptance of the deal that is made.
If a larger company is swallowing a smaller company, they may want to continue to work with the founder/some members of the exec team to help with integration efforts for the companies.
In return, the members of this team typically added incentives and ability to generate even more wealth as a result.
I also negotiated salaries etc early in the process so it's all generally done at the same time before the term sheet.
A lot of the reasoning in the article comes from the difference between being bought vs sold. Hiding lack of runway is clear there. The article repeats a lot of good standard advice & prioritization in general.
A company growing 100% YoY vs a company shrinking 10% a year make the 5x buyout very different sounding to me.,,
Movie ideas can be sold for 6-7 figures.
So why wouldn't something more developed than just an idea also be valuable to someone, ie a good fleshed-out business/product idea and some development, trademark etc, but not yet online/no paying customers, etc.
How to find that someone?
Movie scripts are sold for 7 figures if you have written multiple 7-9 figure movies. Which again, is proof by doing that it is good. If you or me spends 6 months and write a banger movie script, I doubt we can sell it for $250.
And good ideas really are not worthless, though I agree 99% are just not good ideas. This industry would have you believe that ideas are nothing, because their business is funding idea development.
And the assumption is a web product. Of course it's difficult to gauge if a web product is going to work, and you should just try it because it's relatively easy. For real products, this doesn't apply so directly. In some ways it's easier to see if an idea is worth trying out or not, and since it's harder to actually test a real product idea, the idea better be good.
And I'm specifically talking about more than just an idea, particularly some product development and branding.
No one is going to buy your product idea and branding.
Don't believe me? Go try to sell it. Show me the offer letter. I am guessing you do the thing of making people sign a NDA to hear your idea?