I feel like a frog in the boiling pot watching the other frogs try to convince me there’s no danger. I hope you’re correct.
I feel like a frog in the boiling pot watching the other frogs try to convince me there’s no danger. I hope you’re correct.
I’m confused here. I only see Republicans trying to manipulate elections with unsubstantiated voter fraud claims.
FBI gets Hunter laptop Dec 2019, knows it's not a forgery. FBI proceeds to warn social media companies about "Russian disinformation campaigns" about a month or two before election. NY Post does story on Hunter laptop (which includes business dealing with Ukraine). "Former" intelligence agents go on media to say "this has all the markings of a disinformation campaign" (which they know 100% is a lie).
Social media proceeds to ban a 100% factual story, about a presidential candidate weeks for an election.
You don't see the issue?
Another way of asking that is - why was so much effort put into squashing the story if there is nothing there of concern?
Can you provide specific examples of these “blatant lies”? For example, Taibbi’s earlier dumps showed that the testimony to Congress was accurate.
https://slate.com/technology/2018/05/twitter-will-start-hidi...
Bari Weiss tried to misrepresent what shadow banning means but especially here I’d expect people to be familiar with what the term means.